Article Summary
王 彧,高腾君,苗有泉,许志华,阿尖措.分析塞来昔布与不同剂量艾瑞昔布治疗axSpA的效果及对骨代谢的影响[J].现代生物医学进展英文版,2020,(3):553-557.
分析塞来昔布与不同剂量艾瑞昔布治疗axSpA的效果及对骨代谢的影响
Effects of Celecoxib and Different Doses of Imrecoxib in the Treatment of axSpA and Their Influence on Bone Metabolism
Received:April 26, 2019  Revised:May 23, 2019
DOI:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2020.03.033
中文关键词: 中轴脊柱关节炎  艾瑞昔布  塞来昔布  骨代谢
英文关键词: Axial spondyloarthritis  Imrecoxib  Celecoxib  Bone metabolism
基金项目:青海省科技厅科学研究项目(2019-wjzdx-77 )
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
WANG Yu Second Ward of Department of Orthopaedics, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital, Xining, Qinghai, 810000, China bbc19880127@163.com 
GAO Teng-jun Second Ward of Department of Orthopaedics, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital, Xining, Qinghai, 810000, China  
MIAO You-quan Second Ward of Department of Orthopaedics, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital, Xining, Qinghai, 810000, China  
XU Zhi-hua Second Ward of Department of Orthopaedics, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital, Xining, Qinghai, 810000, China  
Ajiacuo Second Ward of Department of Orthopaedics, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital, Xining, Qinghai, 810000, China  
Hits: 894
Download times: 617
中文摘要:
      摘要 目的:探究塞来昔布和2种剂量艾瑞昔布治疗中轴脊柱关节炎(axSpA)的效果及对患者骨代谢的影响。方法:选取我院96例axSpA患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为A组、B组、C组各32例。A组给予0.2 g/d艾瑞昔布治疗,B组给予0.4 g/d艾瑞昔布治疗C组给予0.4 g/d塞来昔布治疗。比较3组治疗前及治疗12周后疾病活动性[C反应蛋白(CRP)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、Bath强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI)]、躯体活动度(踝间距、腰椎侧弯度)、功能状态[Bath强直性脊柱炎功能指数(BASFI)、加拿大脊柱骨关节研究协会评分系统(SPARCC)]、骨代谢[血清骨形成发生蛋白-2(BMP-2)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、Dickkopf相关蛋白1(DKK-1)]差异,并记录3组治疗期间不良反应发生情况。结果:治疗12周后,3组疾病活动性(CRP、ESR、BASDAI)、功能状态(BASFI、SPARCC)、骨代谢(BMP-2、VEGF、DKK-1)均较治疗前降低(P<0.05),躯体活动度(踝间距及左右侧腰椎侧弯度)则较治疗前升高(P<0.05);但B组及C组组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而A组上述指标变化幅度低于B组及C组(P<0.05)。3组治疗期间不良反应发生情况比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:较高剂量(0.4 g/d)艾瑞昔布疗效明显优于较低剂量(0.2 g/d),不良反应也未增加,且0.4 g/d艾瑞昔布及同剂量塞来昔布治疗axSpA具有相似的疗效及安全性,适用于临床治疗。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective: To explore the effects of celecoxib and two doses of imrecoxib in the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and their influence on bone metabolism. Methods: 96 patients with axSpA in our hospital were selected as the study subjects and were divided into group A, group B and group C according to the random number table method, with 32 cases in each group. Group A was treated with 0.2 g/d imrecoxib, and group B was given 0.4 g/d imrecoxib, and group C was given 0.4 g/d celecoxib. The disease activity[C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)], body activity (ankle spacing, lumbar vertebrae lateral curvature), functional status[Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Canadian Spinal and Bone Joint Research Association Scoring System (SPARCC)] and bone metabolism [bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Dickkopf-related protein 1(DKK-1)] were compared among the three groups before treatment and after 12 w of treatment, and the occurrence of adverse reactions during treatment was recorded in the three groups. Results: After 12 w of treatment, the disease activity (CRP, ESR, BASDAI), functional status (BASFI, SPARCC) and bone metabolism (BMP-2, VEGF, DKK-1) in the three groups were lower than those before treatment(P<0.05), and the body activity (ankle spacing, left and right lateral curvature of lumbar vertebrae) was higher than that before treatment(P<0.05), However, there were no significant differences between group B and group C(P>0.05), and the changes of above indicators in group A were lower than those in group B and group C(P<0.05). There were no significant differences in adverse reactions among the three groups during treatment (P>0.05). Conclusion: The higher dose(0.4 g/d) imrecoxib has better efficacy than the lower dose(0.2 g/d), and it does not increase adverse reactions, and 0.4 g/d imrecoxib and the same dose of celecoxib have similar efficacy and safety in the treatment of axSpA, and it is suitable for clinical treatment.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close