Article Summary
王彦焱,凌 彬,古丽仙·艾尔肯,吉 鹏,罗 莉.老年类风湿关节炎患者应用MTX或LEF联合糖皮质激素治疗的效果观察[J].现代生物医学进展英文版,2017,17(15):2903-2906.
老年类风湿关节炎患者应用MTX或LEF联合糖皮质激素治疗的效果观察
Observation on the Effect of MTX or LEF Combined with Glucocorticoid in the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Received:August 19, 2016  Revised:September 20, 2016
DOI:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2017.15.026
中文关键词: 类风湿关节炎  泼尼松  甲氨蝶呤  来氟米特
英文关键词: Rheumatoid arthritis  Prednisone  Methotrexate  Leflunomide
基金项目:新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金项目(2014211C078)
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
王彦焱 新疆医科大学第一附属医院风湿科 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830054 chejibd@yeah.net 
凌 彬 新疆医科大学第一附属医院颌面肿瘤外科 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830054  
古丽仙·艾尔肯 新疆医科大学第一附属医院风湿科 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830054  
吉 鹏 新疆医科大学第一附属医院风湿科 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830054  
罗 莉 新疆医科大学第一附属医院风湿科 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830054  
Hits: 373
Download times: 180
中文摘要:
      摘要 目的:探讨甲氨蝶呤(MTX)或来氟米特(LEF)联合泼尼松(PDN)对老年类风湿关节炎的疗效。方法:选取112例老年RA患者,按随机数表法将患者分为LEF组(n=28)、MTX组(n=28)、LET+PDN组(n=28)、MTX+PDN组(n=28),治疗3个月后统计四组关节肿胀数、关节压痛数、DAS28评分、VAS评分、RF、晨僵时间,并记录不良反应事件。结果:MTX组和LEF组治疗后各项指标均低于治疗前(P<0.05);MTX+PDN组与LEF+PDN组治疗后各项指标均明显低于治疗前(P<0.001);MTX+PDN组治疗效果明显优于MTX组(P<0.001);LEF+PDN组治疗效果明显优于LEF组(P<0.001);MTX+PDN组治疗总有效率为53.57%,高于LEF+PDN组的42.86%,但差异无统计学意义(x2=2.426,P=0.119)。结论:四组对RA均有治疗效果,联合使用效果更佳,且服药后无严重不良反应,安全性较高。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the curative effect of methotrexate (MTX) or leflunomide (LEF) in combination with pred- nisone (PDN) in the treatment of senile rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: 112 elderly patients with RA in our hospital between May 2013 and November 2015 were selected. All patients were divided into LEF group (n=28), MTX group (n=28), LET+PDN group (n=28), MTX+PDN group (n=28) according to the random number table method. After 3 months of treatment, calculate the swollen joints, joint tenderness, DAS28 score, VAS score, RF, morning stiffness time and record the adverse events. Results: The indexes of MTX group and LEF group after treatment were significantly lower than before treatment (P<0.05). The indexes of MTX+PDN group and LEF+PDN group were also significantly lower after treatment than before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). MTX+PDN group showed significantly better effect than MTX group (P<0.001), and LEF+PDN group also showed significantly better effect than LEF group (P<0.001). The total effective rate of MTX+PDN group was 53.57%, higher than that of 42.86% in LEF+PDN group, but the difference was not statistically significant(x2=2.426, P=0.119). Conclusion: The four groups all had curative effect, but the combination of two had better effect, and there were no serious adverse reactions after treatment. The efficacy difference between MTX+PDN group and LEF+PDN group was not distinct, so they can be selected according to the actual situation.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close