王宇华 杨宾烈 张爱 张云珠 徐泠琳.改良腹腔镜手术治疗子宫腺肌症的可行性及安全性研究[J].现代生物医学进展英文版,2016,16(13):2527-2529. |
改良腹腔镜手术治疗子宫腺肌症的可行性及安全性研究 |
Feasibility and Safety of Modified Laparoscopic Surgery in the Treatment ofAdenomyosis |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 子宫腺肌症 腹腔镜 子宫体楔形切除术 全子宫切除术 |
英文关键词: Adenomyosis Laparoscopy Uterus wedge resection Hysterectomy |
基金项目:浦东新区卫生系统领先人才培养计划(PWRI2010-04) |
|
Hits: 803 |
Download times: 0 |
中文摘要: |
目的:探讨改良腹腔镜手术治疗子宫腺肌症的可行性及安全性。方法:84例子宫腺肌症患者,采用方便抽样方法选取接受改
良腹腔镜子宫体楔形切除术的40 例患者作为研究组,接受传统腹腔镜全子宫切除术的44 例患者作为对照组,比较两组手术情
况及术后康复情况。结果:两组术中出血量、手术时间、导尿管留置时间、引流管留置时间、肛门恢复排气时间比较差异无统计学
意义(P>0.05);术后研究组性生活评分、生活质量评分高于对照组(P<0.05),痛经程度评与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.
05);研究组压力性尿失禁、阴道顶端脱垂、直肠膨出发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:改良腹腔镜手术治疗子宫腺肌症的治疗效
果与传统腹腔镜手术相当,但患者性生活及生活质量较高,且对盆底支撑功能影响较小。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective:To investigate the feasibility and safety of improved laparoscopic surgery for adenomyosis of uterus.Methods:Among the 84 cases of uterine adenomyosis patients admitted in hospital, we selected by convenience sampling method 40 patients who
accepted the modified laparoscopic uterine wedge resection as a study group, and 44 patients who accepted conventional laparoscopic
hysterectomy surgery as the control group. We compared the surgery and postoperative rehabilitation situation between the two groups.Results:There were no statistical difference in blood loss during operation, operative time, catheterization time, drainage tube indwelling
time, anal exhaust recovery time between the two groups (P>0.05). After operation, the scores of sexual life and life quality of the study
group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The dysmenorrhea assessment score showed no significant difference between
the two groups (P>0.05). In study group, the incidences of stress urinary incontinence, top vaginal prolapsed and rectal prolapse
were lower than in control group (P<0.05).Conclusion:The modified laparoscopic surgery had relatively equal curative effect for uterine
adenomyosis with the conventional laparoscopic surgery, but a better sexual life and higher quality of life, and less impact on the pelvic
floor support functions for patients. |
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
Close |