苏长岐 王健生 于良 王林 马林.腹腔镜下胆道镜经胆囊管行胆道探查取石术的临床分析[J].现代生物医学进展英文版,2015,15(27):5348-5351. |
腹腔镜下胆道镜经胆囊管行胆道探查取石术的临床分析 |
ClinicalAnalysis ofLaparoscopic TranscysticCommonBileDuctExploration |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 胆道镜 腹腔镜 腹腔镜经胆囊管胆道探查取石术 胆囊结石合并胆总管结石 |
英文关键词: Choledochoscope Laparoscopy Laparoscoplc transcystic common bile duct exploration Gallbladder and common bile
duct stones |
基金项目:陕西省卫生厅科研基金项目(2010H41) |
|
Hits: 895 |
Download times: 0 |
中文摘要: |
目的:探讨腹腔镜下胆道镜经胆囊管行胆道探查取石术(LTCBDE)的可行性以及安全性。方法:124 例胆囊合并胆总管结石
患者,根据手术方式分为LTCBDE 组和腹腔镜胆总管切开取石T管引流术(LCTD组),各62 例,比较两组的手术情况、疗效及安
全性。结果:LTCBDE 的手术时间、术后引流时间、肛门排气时间、术后住院时间及补液量较LCTD 组显著减少(P<0.05);LTCBDE
组并发症发生率及复发率分别为3.23%、1.61%,显著低于LCTD 组的20.97%、11.29%(P<0.05)。结论:LTCBDE 创伤小、患者痛
苦少、术后恢复快、并发症少且复发率低,是治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的一种安全可行的微创治疗手段,值得在临床中推广
应用。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective:To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE).Methods:124 cases of patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones were collected, and all were divided into LTCBDE group
and laparoscopic choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage (LCTD group), 62 cases in each group. The operation situation, the efficacy and
safety of the two groups were compared.Results:The operative time, postoperative drainage time, flatus time, postoperative hospital stay
and the amount of fluid in LTCBDE group were significantly less than LCTD group (P<0.05);the incidence of complications and
recurrence rates in LTCBDE group were 3.23%, 1.61%, significantly lower than the 20.97%, 11.29% in LCTD group (P<0.05).Conclusion:LTCBDE has small wound, less patient pain, faster postoperative recovery, fewer complications and lower recurrence rate,
is a safe and feasible minimally invasive treatment for gallbladder and common bile duct stones, worthy of promotion in clinical
applications. |
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
Close |