| 谢佳芯 李林涛 祝云利 周琦 符培亮 赵辉 陈宜 吴宇黎 吴海山.关节镜下半月板部分切除术与理疗治疗不稳定半月板撕裂的前瞻性对照研究[J].现代生物医学进展英文版,2015,15(21):4146-4148. |
| 关节镜下半月板部分切除术与理疗治疗不稳定半月板撕裂的前瞻性对照研究 |
| Comparison of Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy and PhysicalRehabilitation in the Treatment of Unstable Meniscal Tears: a ProspectiveControlled Trial |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 半月板损伤 关节镜 半月板切除术 康复 |
| 英文关键词: Meniscus injury Arthroscopy Meniscectomy Physical rehabilitation |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目（81071476） |
|
| Hits: 643 |
| Download times: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：评估针对不稳定半月板撕裂，关节镜下半月板部分切除术（APM）是否优于单纯理疗。方法：纳入36 例经磁共振确诊
为不稳定半月板撕裂的患者，平均年龄35 岁，其中9 例伴轻度骨关节炎。所有患者于前8 周，每周行3 次物理治疗，包括股四头
肌功能锻炼和神经-肌肉功能锻炼。完成康复训练后1 周行关节镜下半月板部分切除术。在治疗前、理疗结束后以及术后第4 周
随访时行VAS 评分进行疼痛评估并行Lysholm 评分进行功能评估。结果：36 例患者的VAS 评分由治疗前的5.66± 1.10，改善为
理疗结束后的4.39± 0.95（P＜0.05），行APM 术后则达到1.82± 0.77（P＜0.05），并且理疗对VAS 的改善不如APM 明显（P＜
0.05）。治疗前，伴骨关节炎患者的疼痛症状更为明显，而APM 术后则与不伴骨关节炎的患者无明显差异（P＞0.05）。患者
Lysholm 评分理疗结束后由58.11± 8.06 提高到62.11± 8.34（P＜0.05），APM术后则达到86.78± 5.50（P＜0.05）。相对于骨关节炎
患者，不伴骨关节炎患者的Lysholm 评分更高（P＜0.05）。结论：物理治疗能有效减轻疼痛和肿胀症状，但是对关节活动受限等改
善不明显。APM相对于理疗能有效缓解症状，改善膝关节功能。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective:To evaluate whether arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) was superior to physical therapy in the treatment
of unstable meniscal tears.Methods:A total of 36 patients were diagnosed with unstable meniscal tears by clinical examination and
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Age ranged from19 to 50 years (average 35.08). Mild osteoarthritis was diagnosed in 9 cases. Physical
therapy was offered 3 times per week for the first 8 weeks, including faradic quadriceps stimulation and neuromuscular strengthening
exercises. After physical therapy, patients were treated by APM. Outcomes were evaluated by the VAS score and the Lysholm score.Results:Mean VAS before interventions was 5.66± 1.10, significantly improved to 4.39± 0.95 after physical therapy and to 1.82 after APM
(P＜0.05). Before intervention, patients with osteoarthritis suffered more pain than those without osteoarthritis. Furthermore, patients
with osteoarthritis had similar VAS score with those without osteoarthritis after APM (P＞0.05). Mean Lysholm score before physical
therapy was 58.11± 8.06, significantly improved to62.11± 8.34 after physical therapy and to 86.78± 5.50 after APM(P＜0.05). However,
patients without osteoarthritis had higher Lysholm scores than those with osteoarthritis after APM (P＜0.05).Conclusion:Physical
therapy could effectively relieve pain and swelling, but not significantly on improving joint functions. APMcould exert better effects on
relieving joint symptoms or improving joint functions than that of physical therapy. |
|
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
