| 祝建勇 邱宝安 郭晓东 夏念信 杨英祥 刘鹏 安阳 吴印涛.损伤控制性手术在肝胆外科治疗中的临床应用价值[J].现代生物医学进展英文版,2015,15(13):2454-2456. |
| 损伤控制性手术在肝胆外科治疗中的临床应用价值 |
| Clinical Value of the Damage Control Operation Applied to the patobiliary Surgery |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 肝胆外科手术 损伤控制 应用价值 |
| 英文关键词: Hepatobiliary surgery Damage control operation Application value |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目（81301239） |
|
| Hits: 719 |
| Download times: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：损伤控制性手术（Damage Control Operation，DCO）是针对严重创伤患者进行阶段性修复的外科策略，本文通过观察
DCO在肝胆外科治疗中的效果，探讨其临床应用价值，为肝胆外科手术治疗提供参考。方法：选取2012 年2 月-2013 年3 月我院
收治的90 例重症肝胆外伤患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。将所选病例随机分为对照组和DCO 组，每组45 例。其中对照组实
施常规手术治疗，DCO组实施损伤控制性手术进行治疗。对比两组患者的手术时间，术中出血量、死亡率、术后感染及并发症等。
结果：DCO组手术时间为(62.59± 8.61) min，术中出血量为(306.48± 23.54) mL，死亡率为20%，术后感染率为8.89%，并发症的发
生率为11.11%；对照组术时间为(90.35± 7.86) min，术中出血量为(600.32± 34.21) mL，死亡率为53.33%，术后感染率为24.44%，
并发症的发生率为35.56%；DCO组患者的各项指标均优于对照组，差异显著且具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：在肝胆外科治疗
中采用损伤控制性手术具有明显的临床效果，不但缩短了手术时间，减少出血量，降低死亡率，提高手术成功率，而且降低了术后
并发症及感染的发生率，值得推广。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective:The damage control operation is a clinical strategy which is devoted to reconstructing the open injuries of
patients for a period of time. This article aims to discussing the application of damage control operation on the hepatobiliary surgery in
order to make a reference.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 90 patients with severe liver injuries
who were treated in our hospital from February 2012 to March 2013. The selected patients were divided into the control group and the
DCO group with 45 in each one. The patients in the control group were received the routine operation method, while the patients in the
DCO group were treated by the damage control operation. Then the operation time, the blood loss, the rate of death, the incidence of
infection and complications after the operation were compared and analyzed between two groups.Results:In the DCO group, the
operation time was (62.59± 8.61) min, the blood loss was (306.48± 23.54) mL, the death rate was 20%, the infection rate was 8.89%and
the incidence of complications was 11.11%; In the control group, the operation time was (90.35 ± 7.86) min, the blood loss was
(600.32± 34.21) mL, the death rate was 53.33%, the infection rate was 24.44% and the incidence of complications was 35.56%; The
indicators of the DCO group were significantly better than those of the control group with statistically differences (P<0.05).Conclusion:The damage control operation is worthy of promoting to the clinical field with the advantages of obvious efficacy, shorter time for
operation, less blood loss, higher rate of success as well as the lower incidence of infection and complications after the surgery. |
|
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
|
|
|
