| 王春雨 李宇周 张桂丽 彭宗生 刘品静.关于两种全自 动生化分析仪校准周期的对比研究[J].现代生物医学进展英文版,2015,15(7):1328-1331. |
| 关于两种全自 动生化分析仪校准周期的对比研究 |
| The Contrastive Analysis of the Calibrating Period between Two Kinds ofFully Automatic Biochemical Analyzers |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 生物化学 仪器与 设备 校准周期 日 立 H71 80 奥林帕斯 Au640 |
| 英文关键词: Biochemistry Instrument and facility Calibrating period Hitachi H71 80 Olympus Au640 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Hits: 864 |
| Download times: 1316 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的： 对日 立 H7180、奥林帕斯 Au640 全自 动生化分析仪校准周 期的对比分析。 方法： 相同 条件下， 两生化分析仪进行定标
校准后， 每隔 2 小时测定高、中、低 3 种浓度的质控血清各一次直到 24 h， 后每间隔 24 h 测定一次， 共测定 30 d， 检测项目 均重复
测定 4 次取平均值。 从校准完成后开始计时到 累 积变异系数(CV)大于 1／ 6 CLIA'88 允许误差时终止， 确定该项目 的校准周 期。 通
过绘制校准周 期图获得两种全自 动生化分析仪不同检测项目 的校准周期，并对结果进行对比分析。 结果： 以碱性磷酸酶（ ALP）为
例 绘制校准周 期图，进行对比分析。 各检测项目 在日 立 H71 80 中，低水平质控 CV 最先达到 校准要求，高水平质控 CV 最后达到
校准要求； 而在奥林帕斯 Au640 中，中水平质控 CV 最先达到校准要求，高水平质控 CV 最后达到校准要求。 结论： 日 立 H7180 和
奥林帕斯 Au640 全自 动生化分析仪， 其校准周期基本一致， 个别项目 存在差异。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective:The contrastive analysis of the calibrating period between the fully automatic biochemical analyzers Hitachi
H7180 and Olympus Au640 was carried out in this experiment.Methods:Under the same condition, after taking the regular calibration
and adjustment for the two biochemical analyzers, test the quality control sera of the high, middle and low concentration levels separately
every two hours till 24 hours later, then take the test once every 24 hours, with the total amount of time for 30 days. All the test items will
be tested repeatedly four times to gain the average data. The calibrating period of this item starts from the fulfillment of the calibration till
the cumulative coefficient of variation (CV) goes beyond 1／ 6 CLIA'88 permissible error. The calibrating period of the different test
items from the two biochemical analyzers was obtained by drawing calibrating periodogram, and contrastive analysis of the results was
carried out in this experiment.Results:The calibrating periodograms of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were drawn and contrasted. The results revealed that when the experiment of every testing item was carried out in Hitachi H71 80, the calibrating request was fulfilled at
first by the low level quality control CV, and at last by the high level quality control CV; while in Olympus Au640, the calibrating request
was fulfilled at first by the middle level control CV, and at last by high level quality control CV.Conclusion:Basically, the two fully automatic biochemical analyzers Hitachi H7180 and Olympus Au640 have the same calibrating period, with variation in some individual
items. |
|
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
