| 熊健1 佘远举1 许永涛1 吴起宁2 何立民2△.不同植入物内固定治疗四肢创伤骨折后骨不连
的临床对比研究*[J].现代生物医学进展英文版,2014,14(20):3873-3876. |
| 不同植入物内固定治疗四肢创伤骨折后骨不连
的临床对比研究* |
| Comparative Study of Bone Union after Different Implant Fixationin treating Limb Trauma Fracture* |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 植入物内固定 四肢创伤骨折 骨不连 LC-DCP LCP |
| 英文关键词: Implant fixation Limb trauma fracture Nonunion LC-DCP LCP |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(81100930) |
|
| Hits: 752 |
| Download times: 1199 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 摘要目的：探讨不同植入物内固定治疗四肢创伤骨折后骨不连的临床疗效。方法：选择我科2010 年2 月~2013 年2 月四肢创伤
骨折后骨不连患者38例，按照随机数表法将38 例患者随机分为两组，分别为LC-DCP组以及LCP 组，每组各19 例，观察两组患
者的平均手术持续时间、骨折临床愈合时间、X线骨痂评分以及并发症。结果：LC-DCP 组平均手术持续时间为（134.73± 12.91）
min，LCP 组为（129.54± 14.87）min，两组比较不存在统计学差异（P>0.05）。LC-DCP组患者平均骨折临床愈合时间为（3.94± 0.83）
月，LCP 组为（3.81± 0.69）月，两组间不存在统计学显著性差异（P>0.05）。LC-DCP组患者X线骨痂评价标准平均评分值为
（2.73± 0.51）分，LCP组为（2.86± 0.49）分，两组间差异不存在统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：两种钢板联合植骨治疗四肢创伤骨折后
骨不连均能够取得良好的治疗效果，均可以作为治疗四肢创伤骨折后骨不连患者的有效方法。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| ABSTRACT Objective:To investigate the clinical contrast of bone union after different implant fixation in treating limb fractures.
Methods:38 cases with bone union after limb trauma fractures fromFebruary 2010 to February 2013 were selected and randomly divided
into LC-DCP group and LCP group with 19 cases respectively according to a randomnumber table method. 19 cases in both groups were
observed with average duration of surgery, fracture healing time, X-ray score of bone callus and complications.Results: The average
duration of surgery was (134.73 ± 12.91) min in LC-DCP group and (129.54 ± 14.87) min in LCP group, the difference had no statistical
significance(P> 0.05). The fracture healing time was (3.94 ± 0.83) months in LC-DCP group and (3.81 ± 0.69) months in LCP group, the
difference had no statistical significance(P> 0.05).The standard average X-ray score of bone callus was (2.73 ± 0.51) points in LC-DCP
group and (2.86 ± 0.49) points in LCP group, the difference had no statistical significance (P> 0.05).Conclusion: Both steel plates
combined with bone grafting on treating limb trauma fracture nonunion were able to achieve satisfying therapeutic effect and can be
applied as effective treatments for patient with bone union after limb trauma fracture. |
|
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
