| 田丰卢强李小飞周勇安韩勇王小平△.CBL+PBL与PBL教学法在胸腔外科临床教学中
的对比分析[J].现代生物医学进展英文版,2014,14(10):1977-1979. |
| CBL+PBL与PBL教学法在胸腔外科临床教学中
的对比分析 |
| Application of CBL+PBL Method in Clinical Education of ThoracicSurgery and Compared it with PBL Method |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 病例引导教学法 问题为中心教学法 临床教学 胸外科教学 |
| 英文关键词: Case-based learning Problembased learning Clinical education Teaching of thoracic surgery |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Hits: 794 |
| Download times: 929 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 摘要目的：对比PBL教学法，研究CBL+PBL法在五年制临床医学本科胸腔外科临床教学中的应用及效果。方法：抽取五年制本
科临床实习生共59 人，随机分为实验组（29 人）与对照组（30 人），实验组采用CBL+PBL 教学法讲授临床实践课，对照组采用单
纯PBL法。授课结束后进行随堂测试及问卷调查。结果：①随堂测试：实验组病例分析题及总成绩高于对照组且差异有统计学意
义（P<0.05），选择题与简答题两组间成绩比较无统计学差异。②问卷调查：在是否有利于培养临床思维能力以及是否有利于理论
联系临床问题中，实验组肯定回答的人数比例均高于对照组且差别有统计学意义。（P<0.05）。两组之间在是否有利于提高学习兴
趣、是否有利于提高团队协作能力、是否有利于知识的理解以及是否赞同本教学方法问题中，差异无统计学意义。结论：
CBL+PBL教学法相对于单纯的PBL教学法而言，更适合在临床教学中应用。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| ABSTRACT Objective：To investigate the effects of CBL+PBL Method in Clinical Education of Thoracic Surgery and Compared it
with PBL Method.Methods：Fifty-nine internships were divided in two groups randomly. The experimental group was applied with
CBL+PBL method in their practice lesson, and the control group was applied with PBL method. When the class was over, a classroom
test and a questionnaire survey were made. Results：① Classroomtest: There was statistical difference between the two groups in score of
case analysis and total points (P<0.05), but no statistical difference in choice-questions and short-answer questions. ② Questionnaire
survey: There was statistical difference between the two groups in promotion of ability of clinical thinking and ability of apply theory to
clinic (P<0.05), but no statistical difference in promotion of cInterest in learning, ability of the team, Comprehension of knowledge and
approve of this teaching method. Conclusion：CBL+PBL method was more suitable for clinical education than PBL method. |
|
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
