Article Summary
刘伟1 郑军1 赵延春2.腹腔镜联合胆道镜微创手术与开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管 结石的疗效比较[J].现代生物医学进展英文版,2012,12(12):2359-2361.
腹腔镜联合胆道镜微创手术与开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管 结石的疗效比较
Comparison of Laparoscopic Choledocholithotomy Combined withCholedochoscopy and Traditional Choledochotomy in Treatmentof Cholelithiasis and Choledocholithiasis
  
DOI:
中文关键词: 腹腔镜  胆道镜  胆囊结石  胆总管结石
英文关键词: Laparoscopy  Choledochoscopy  Cholelithiasis  Choledocholithiasis
基金项目:
Author NameAffiliation
LIU Wei1, ZHENG Jun1, ZHAO Yan-chun2 三峡大学第一临床医学院普通外科 
Hits: 797
Download times: 0
中文摘要:
      目的:比较分析腹腔镜联合胆道镜微创手术与开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效。方法:将2009 年10 月-2011 年5 月因胆囊结石合并胆总管结石行手术治疗的100 例患者,分为微创手术组和开腹手术组,分析比较微创手术组与开腹手术 组之间患者的手术时间、术后通气所需时间与镇痛药使用情况、住院时间与完全康复时间。结果:与开腹组相比:微创组患者的手 术时间之间无明显差异;但微创组术后通气时间。住院时间与完全康复时间、镇痛药的使用率均明显短于或低于开腹组(P <0.05)。结 论:对合适的患者,腹腔镜联合胆道镜微创手术入路治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石能够获得良好的效果,值得借鉴。
英文摘要:
      Objective: To compare the effect of laparoscopic choledocholithotomy combined with choledochoscopy and traditional choledochotomy in treatment of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Methods: 100 patients with cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis from October 2009 to May 2011 were treated with surgical operation. They were divided randomly and averagely into two groups: minimally invasive surgery group treated with laparoscopy and choledochoscopy and traditional choledochotomy group. The surgical time, use of Analgetika, complication, days in hospital after operation were observed and compared. Results: The operation time between the two groups had no significant difference. Compared with traditional choledochotomy group, minimally invasive surgery group had lower use rate of Analgetika, shorter ventilation time, shorter recovery time of intestinal tract function, fewer complication and shorter stay in hospital (P<0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy combined with choledochoscopy in treating cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis is safe and feasible with availed effect of minimal invasiveness.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close