杨慧王丽杨梅周佳马芳.健康教育干预应用于喉切除术后患者的效果观察[J].现代生物医学进展英文版,2011,11(17):3349-3351. |
健康教育干预应用于喉切除术后患者的效果观察 |
The health education intervention applies after the throat excision methodpatient's effect observation |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 喉切除术 健康教育 干预 |
英文关键词: Throat excision method Health education Intervention |
基金项目: |
|
Hits: 609 |
Download times: 758 |
中文摘要: |
目的:探讨健康教育干预应用于喉切除术后患者的临床效果。方法:将符合诊断标准的86 例患者随机分为观察组、治疗组,
对照组给予常规护理,观察组给予鼻饲营养健康教育、咳嗽方法健康教育、吞咽功能健康教育、语言训练健康教育等健康教育措
施。结果:两组平均住院时间比较,观察组平均住院时间( 18.8±5.3) d,明显少于对照组的(21.5±5.2) d,差异有统计学意义(t=2.
3845,P<0.05)。两组并发症发生率比较,观察组并发症发生率2.32%明显少于对照组的18.60%,差异有统计学意义(x2=4.47,P<0.
05)。结论:健康教育干预可增强护理人员与患者之间的互动、促进护患关系融洽,增进患者对护理人员的尊重、信任,增加了患者
对自身疾病的了解,及自我护理能力的提高,增加了战胜疾病的信心,提高了生活质量。值得临床进一步推广应用。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective: Discusses the health education intervention applies after the throat excision method patient's clinical effect.
Methods: Will meet the diagnostic criteria, 86 patients were randomly divided into two groups, treatment group, control group received
routine care, observation group were given nasal feeding nutrition and health education, health education methods coughing, swallowing
function of health education, language training, health education, health education measures. Results: Two group of average in hospital
time comparison, the observation group average in hospital time (18.8±5.3) d, is short in the control group obviously (21.5±5.2) d, the
difference has statistics significance (t=2.3845, P <0.05).Two group of complication formation rate comparison, the observation group
complication formation rate 2.32% are short obviously in the control group 18.60%, the difference has statistics significance (x2=4.47,
P<0.05). Conclusions: The health education intervention may strengthen between the nursing staffs and patient's interaction, promotes to
protect the trouble relations to be harmonious, promotes the patient to nursing staffs' respect, the trust, increased the patient the understanding
which gets sick to own illness, and the self-nursing ability's enhancement, increased has defeated the confidence which illness
got sick, improved the quality of life. Is worth clinical further promoting the application. |
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
Close |
|
|
|