| 于焕清郭宗君△ 王晓林邢昂章政贾秀娟毛拥军杨乃龙.老年轻度认知障碍患者生活高危因素探讨[J].现代生物医学进展英文版,2011,11(10):1885-1890. |
| 老年轻度认知障碍患者生活高危因素探讨 |
| Exploration of High Risk Factors in Lifestyle for Mild CognitiveImpairment in Elderly People |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 轻度认知障碍(MCI) 老年 生活因素 |
| 英文关键词: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) Elderly people Lifestyle factors |
| 基金项目:山东省科技厅基金资助项目（22130109）；国家“十一五”科技支撑计划（2006BAI02B01）；
青岛市科技局基金资助项目（Kzd-03, 09-1-1-33-nsh） |
|
| Hits: 716 |
| Download times: 1193 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：探讨生活高危因素对老年轻度认知障碍的影响。方法：应用简明精神状态量表(MMSE) 、蒙特利尔认知测验量表
（MoCA）、临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)和生活高危因素量表对219 例老年人进行调查，分析生活高危因素对老年轻度认知障碍的影
响。结果：女性患MCI 风险高于男性（P＝0.03）；文盲组患MCI 风险高于小学组，小学组高于初中及以上组（P＝0.00）；农民组患
MCI 风险高于工人组，工人组高于管理人员组（P＝0.01）；农村居民患MCI 风险高于城市居民（P＝0.01）；运动影响MCI 发病，不
运动组患MCI 风险高于运动组（P＝0.00），运动频率＜4 次/ 周高于运动频率≥4 次/ 周（P＝0.00），运动年数≤10 年组高于运
动＞10 年组（P＝0.01）；业余爱好影响MCI 发病，无业余爱好组患MCI 风险高于有业余爱好组（P＝0.00），业余爱好史≤10 年组
高于业余爱好史＞10 组（P＝0.00）。不同年龄的老年人其MCI 发病风险无统计学差异(P＞0.05)；吸烟、饮酒、喝茶等不同年数及频
率的老年人其MCI 发病风险无统计学差异(P＞0.05) ；是否午休及不同午休频率和不同每晚睡眠时间的老年人其MCI 发病风险
无统计学差异(P＞0.05)。结论：性别、教育程度、职业、居住地、运动时间及频率、业余爱好时间等因素与老年MCI 发病有关。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective: To explore the influence of risk factors in lifestyle to elderly mild cognitive impairment. Methods: With the
score of (mini-mental state examination) MMSE,(Montreal Cognitive Assessment) MoCA, (Clinical dementia rating scale) CDR and the
risk factors of life scale, the study investigated 219 elderly people aged over 60 years to analyze high risk factors in lifestyle of mild
cognitive impairment. Results: The male was higher than the men in the risk of MCI (P = 0.03); The illiteracy group was higher than the
Primary school group in the risk of MCI, middle school and above group was higher than the Primary school group in the risk of MCI(P =
0.00); The farmer group was higher than the worker group in the risk of MCI；The worker group was higher than the management group
in the risk of MCI (P = 0.01);The rural residents were higher than the urban residents in the risk of MCI (P = 0.01); The exercise
influenced the incidence of MCI. Exercise group was higher than the non-exercise group in the risk of MCI (P =0.00); The hobby
influenced the incidence of MCI, A hobby group was higher than the non-hobby group in the risk of MCI (P = 0.00). Age was no
significant difference in the risk of elderly MCI (P> 0.05); The groups between different smoking, drinking, drinking tea (the history of
years, frequency, etc.) were no significant difference in the risk of elderly MCI (P> 0.05); Whether the lunch break or not, different
frequency of lunch break and different sleeping hours per night were no significant different in the risk of elderly MCI (P> 0.05).
Conclusions: gender, education level, occupation, place of residence, exercise and hobbies and so on had something to do with the risk of
elderly MCI . |
|
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
| Close |
|
|
|
