文章摘要
王 宏,夏永寿,加 静,苏海川,魏鹏飞.围手术期介入治疗对伽玛刀治疗肝癌肝硬化临床疗效及预后的影响[J].,2018,(24):4686-4689
围手术期介入治疗对伽玛刀治疗肝癌肝硬化临床疗效及预后的影响
Effect of Perioperative Interventional Therapy on the Gamma Knife in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Cirrhosis and Its Prognosis
投稿时间:2018-08-03  修订日期:2018-08-28
DOI:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2018.24.018
中文关键词: 围手术期  介入治疗  伽玛刀  肝癌  肝硬化  临床疗效
英文关键词: Perioperative period  Interventional therapy  Gamma knife  Liver cancer  Liver cirrhosis  Clinical efficacy
基金项目:陕西省教育厅科学研究计划项目(2013JK0799)
作者单位E-mail
王 宏 唐都医院肿瘤科 陕西 西安 710038 wanghong_19711208@163.com 
夏永寿 西安市长安医院血液科 陕西 西安 710016  
加 静 西安医学院第二附属医院肿瘤内科 陕西 西安 710038  
苏海川 唐都医院肿瘤科 陕西 西安 710038  
魏鹏飞 陕西中医药大学附属医院放疗科 陕西 咸阳 712046  
摘要点击次数: 445
全文下载次数: 228
中文摘要:
      摘要 目的:探究围手术期介入治疗对伽玛刀治疗肝癌肝硬化临床疗效及预后的影响。方法:选取2013年1月~2015年1月在我院就诊的肝癌肝硬化患者共61例,按照随机数字表法分为对照组(30例)和观察组(31例),对照组患者仅进行伽玛刀治疗,观察组患者进行围手术期介入治疗联合伽玛刀治疗,比较两组患者治疗后的总有效率、治疗后1年和3年的生存率以及不良反应的发生情况。结果:观察组患者治疗后总有效率为77.4%,显著高于对照组(53.3%,P<0.05);观察组治疗后1年和3年生存率分别为74.2%、45.2%,均显著高于对照组(53.3%、20.0%,P<0.05);两组患者治疗后均发生不同程度的不良反应,但经对症治疗均有效好转,两组不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:围手术期介入治疗联合伽玛刀治疗肝癌患者可以有效提高治疗的总有效率以及治疗后1年和3年的生存率,且安全性好。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective: To explore the effect of perioperative interventional therapy on the clinical efficacy and prognosis of gamma knife radiosurgery for liver cirrhosis. Methods: 61 cases of patients with liver cirrhosis treated in our hospital from January 2013 to Jan- uary 2015 were divided into the control group (30 cases) and the observation group (31 cases). The patients in control group were treated with gamma knife alone. The patients in observation group were treated with gamma knife treatment in the perioperative period. The total effective rate, 1- and 3-year survival rate and incidence of adverse reactions after treatment were observed and compared between two groups. Results: After treatment, the total effective rate of observation group was 77.4%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group(53.3%, P<0.05). The 1- and 3-year survival rates of observation group were 74.2% and 45.2%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the control group(53.3% and 20%, P<0.05). After treatment, various adverse reactions were found in both groups, but there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion: Interventional therapy combined with gamma knife can effectively improve the total effective rate and the 1- and 3-year survival rates in the treatment of liver cancer patients, and there is no significant increase in the incidence of adverse reactions with good safety.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭