| 李小溪 李筱涵 陈澎 乔梦然 李晶 孙志强△.四种胃蛋白酶原检测试剂的性能比较[J].,2017,17(7):1270-1273 |
| 四种胃蛋白酶原检测试剂的性能比较 |
| Comparative Analysis of Four Reagents in Detection of SerumPepsinogen |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 胃蛋白酶原 对比 免疫比浊法 |
| 英文关键词: Pepsinogen Comparative analysis Turbidimetric immunoassay |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1370 |
| 全文下载次数: 1044 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：比较四种胃蛋白酶原检测试剂的性能。方法：使用Beckman Coulter AU5800全自动生化分析仪，采用免疫比浊法，对
两种国产和两种进口蛋白酶原检测试剂的校准和质控、精密度、线性范围、检测灵敏度、前带反应影响和抗干扰能力进行比较。结
果：四家公司的校准和质控指标均达到合格标准，两家进口试剂变异系数较小，在线性、准确性、灵敏度、前带反应等指标全面领
先。结论：综合各项指标判断，目前使用的胃蛋白酶原检测试剂以两种进口产品性能为佳，国产品尚有一定差距。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective:To compare the performance of the four pepsinogen detection reagent.Methods:To compare the calibration
and quality control, protease precision, linear range and detection sensitivity of the detection of two kinds of domestic reagents and another
two kinds of imported reagents by the method of turbidimetric immunoassay with the Beckman Coulter AU5800 automatic biochemical
analyzer.Results:The calibration and quality control of all reagents were up to standard, the two imported reagents had better performance
in coefficient of variation, especially in precision, linear range, detection sensitivity and hook effect.Conclusion:The two kinds of
imported reagents had better performance than that of the domestic ones. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
