| 王占勇 张晓毅 孙家各 李书飞 户晓.前列腺癌根治术治疗不同分级前列腺癌患者的临床研究[J].,2017,17(3):510-512 |
| 前列腺癌根治术治疗不同分级前列腺癌患者的临床研究 |
| Clinical Study of Radical Prostatectomy in Treatment of Patients withDifferent Grade of Prostate Cancer |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 前列腺癌根治术 高危前列腺癌 疗效 |
| 英文关键词: Radical prostatectomy High risk prostate cancer Efficacy |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 790 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：探究前列腺癌根治术在不同危险度前列腺癌患者中治疗的临床效果，为临床前列腺癌患者的治疗提供依据。方法：选
择2008 年1 月~2015 年12 月期间我院94例前列腺癌患者为研究对象，根据D'Amico 评分将其分为高危、中危及低危三组，收
集患者基线资料、术后随访资料，并比较三组手术并发症；采用Kaplan-Meier 分析法计算三组患者生存率，并采用Log-rank 检验
比较不同危险组的生存率。结果：高危组患者进行开放性手术人数多于中危组和低危组，且中危组多于低危组，差异具有统计学
意义(P<0.05)；高危组患者术前Gleason 评分和PAS 水平高于中危组和低危组，且中危组高于低危组，差异具有统计学意义(P<0.
05)；术后5年高危组患者完全控尿率显著低于中危组和低危组（P<0.05）；三组患者间5 年无生化复发率比较无统计学意义（P>0.
05）。结论：前列腺癌根治术治疗高危前列腺患者较中、低危患者疗效较差，但仍可达到较好的疗效，可在临床推广使用。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective:To explore the clinical effect of radical prostatectomy in the treatment of patients with different risk of
prostate cancer,and to provide the basis for clinical treatment of prostate cancer.Methods:Selected 94 cases of Patients with prostate cancer
who treated with radical mastectomy in our hospital fromJanuary 2008 to December 2010 as the research object, which were divided
into high-risk, medium-risk and low-risk group according to the score of Amico 'D. Collected the baseline data and follow-up data of patients
and compared the complications of surgical among three groups; calculated the rate of survival by Kaplan Meier method, and compared
the survival rate in different risk groups by log rank test.Results:The number of open surgery patients in high risk group were more
than that in the mediumand low risk groups, and the middle group was more than lower risk groups, the differences were statistically significant(
P<0.05); Preoperative Gleason score and PAS level in high-risk group were higher than those in the medium and low risk groups,
and the mediumrisk group was higher than those in the low risk group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The rate of
complete control of urine after 5 years of surgery in high-risk group was significant lower than that of the medium and low risk groups
(P<0.05); There was no significant statistical significance between the three groups of patients with no recurrence rate for 5 years(P>0.
05).Conclusion:The efficacy of radical prostatectomy in the treatment of prostate cancer patients with high risk is poorer than the middle
and lower risk patients, but it still has a good efficacy, which can be used in clinical promotion. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
