阳甜 李宏 陈天君 尚东 杨岚△.PBL与LBL教学法在内科学查房教学中的临床对比研究[J].,2016,16(29):5793-5796 |
PBL与LBL教学法在内科学查房教学中的临床对比研究 |
Clinical Comparative Study of Problem-based Learning and Lecture-basedLearning in Teaching Rounds of Internal Medicine |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: PBL教学法 LBL教学法 教学查房 |
英文关键词: Problem-based learning method Lecture-based learning method Teaching rounds |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 704 |
全文下载次数: 0 |
中文摘要: |
目的:比较以问题为基础(PBL)和以授课为基础(LBL)的教学法在内科学查房教学中的应用效果。方法:选取2014 年6 月
-2015 年6 月内科78 名本科实习生参与研究,将学生随机分成PBL教学组(n=39 名)和LBL教学组(n=39 名),经过为期一年的学
习后通过综合考试及问卷调查评价教学效果。结果:PBL组学生的理论考试成绩总分及病例分析题得分显著高于LBL组学生,差
异有统计学意义(P<0.05);PBL教学组学生在提高学生文献检索的能力、自学能力、解决问题的能力、提高学习效率、锻炼人际沟
通能力、培养团队合作精神、有利于理解记忆知识、接受该教学方法的占比明显高于与LBL 教学组学生,具有统计学意义(P<0.
05)。结论:与LBL教学法相比,PBL教学法在教学查房中具有较好的教学效果,在提高学生的文献检索能力、自学能力、解决问题
的能力、人际沟通能力、团队合作等综合素质有优势。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective:To compare the effect of problem-based learning(PBL)and lecture-based learning(LBL)in teaching rounds
of internal medicine.Methods:There were 78 undergraduate students practicing in internal medicine from June of 2014 to June of 2015
divided into PBL group(n=39) and LBL group(n=39) randomly, PBL and LBL teaching methods were used in the two groups respectively
for one year. The teaching effectiveness of these two teaching methods were compared and appraised.Results:Total scores of theory test
and the scores of clinical analysis of PBL group were significantly higher than that of LBL group (P<0.05). The proportion of improved
literature retrieval capability, Self-study ability, problemsolving ability, learning efficiency, communication ability, teamcooperation spirit,
understanding memory ability and willing to accept in PBL group teaching method was significantly higher than that of LBL group.Conclusion:Compared with LBL teaching methods, PBL teaching method in the clinical teaching rounds has better teaching effect, with
advantage of improving students'ability of literature retrieval, self-study ability, problem-solving ability, communication ability and team
cooperation. |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |