| 龙欣 李晓林 陈文太 徐近源 杨志强.正畸带环与树脂临时冠对牙隐裂暂时性保护的疗效比较[J].,2016,16(23):4526-4528 |
| 正畸带环与树脂临时冠对牙隐裂暂时性保护的疗效比较 |
| Comparison of Orthodontic Band and Resin Temporary Crown forTemporary Protection of Cracked Tooth |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 树脂临时冠 正畸带环 牙隐裂 疗效 |
| 英文关键词: Resin temporary crown Orthodontic band Cracked tooth Efficacy |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 870 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：研究正畸带环与树脂临时冠对牙隐裂暂时性保护的临床疗效，为临床治疗提供依据。方法：选取2013 年5 月到2015
年4 月我院收治的牙隐裂患者196 例，按照随机数字表法将患者分为A 组和B 组，每组98 例，A 组给予正畸带环治疗，B组给予
树脂临时冠治疗，比较两组固定效果、咬合情况、牙周情况以及满意度。结果：两组固定成功率比较无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；A 组
牙龈炎发生率为12.2％显著高于B 组的3.1%，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；B 组满意度为95.9％显著显著高于A 组的
80.6%，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论：树脂临时冠较正畸带环对牙隐裂暂时性保护作用较好，患者满意率较高，值得临床
推广应用。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective:To study the efficacy of orthodontic band and resin temporary crown for temporary protection of cracked
tooth, and to provide the basis for clinical treatment.Methods:A total of 196 patients with cracked tooth, who were admitted to Zigong
Fourth People's Hospital of Sichuan Province fromMay 2013 to April 2015, were selected and randomly divided into group A(n=98) and
groupB (n=98). Group A was treated with orthodontic band, group B, resin temporary crown. The fixed effects, occlusion, periodontal
condition and satisfaction degree of the two groups were compared.Results:There was no significance in the fixed success rate between
the two groups(P>0.05). The gingivitis rate(12.2%) of group A was significantly higher than that(3.1%) of group B, the difference was
statistically significant(P<0.05). The satisfaction(95.9%) of group B was significantly higher than that(80.6%) of group A, the difference
was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion:Resin temporary crown had better temporary protective efficacy compared with orthodontic
band, with higher satisfaction degree of patients,which is worthy of clinical popularization and application. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
