| 周广红 马利平 刘思玮 张晓辉 栾静 张艳秋.全髋关节置换术与双极人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的临床疗效[J].,2015,15(36):7180-7182 |
| 全髋关节置换术与双极人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的临床疗效 |
| Clinical Effects of Total Hip Arthroplasty and Bipolar Hemiarthroplastyon the Treatment of Senile Femoral Neck Fracture for the Elderly Patients |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 全髋关节置换术 双极人工股骨头置换术 股骨颈骨折 老年患者 |
| 英文关键词: Total hip arthroplasty Bipolar hemiarthroplasty Femoral neck fracture Elderly patients |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目（30901795） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 678 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：探讨全髋关节置换术（THA）与双极人工股骨头置换术（BHA）治疗老年股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。方法：选择2013 年7
月-2015 年3 月我院收治的老年股骨颈骨折患者90 例，根据手术方法不同将患者分为全髋关节置换组（THA 组）和双极人工股
骨头置换组（BHA 组），每组45 例。观察并比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、术后并发症的发生率及手术效果。结
果：两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量及住院时间比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；THA 组并发症的发生率明显低于BHA 组，
差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）；术后1 年，两组手术优良率比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；术后两年及三年，THA 组手术优良
率明显高于BHA 组，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：THA和BHA 治疗老年股骨颈骨折均具有良好的临床疗效，但THA具
有更好的远期疗效，而且术后并发症的发生率较低。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective:To compare the clinical curative effect of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA)
on the treatment of senile femoral neck fracture for elderly patients.Methods:90 elderly patients with femoral neck fracture who were
treated in our hospital from July 2013 to March 2015 were selected, and according to the different treatment methods, the patients were
divided into the total hip arthroplasty group (THA) and the bipolar hemiarthroplasty group (BHA), with 45 cases in each group. Then the
operation time, the intraoperative blood loss, the hospitalization, the incidence of postoperative complications and the clinical effects in
the two groups were observed and compared.Results:There was no statistically significant difference about the operation time, the
intraoperative blood loss and the hospitalization of the patients in the two groups (P>0.05); The incidence of postoperative complications
in the THA group was lower than that of the BHA group (P<0.05); There was no statistically significant difference about the clinical
effects in the two groups after the treatment for one year (P>0.05); The clinical effects in the THA group after the treatment for two and
three years were significantly higher than those of BHA group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion:THA and BHA have a good clinical efficacy on the treatment of senile femoral neck fracture for elderly patients, and THA is better for a
long-termcurative effect and lower postoperative complications. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
