| 孙继成 惠铎铎 马进 代静 胡文东.某军校2014 级与2010 级新生16PF的比较分析[J].,2015,15(32):6366-6370 |
| 某军校2014 级与2010 级新生16PF的比较分析 |
| Research on the Results Difference of 16PF of the New Cadets in 2014 and2010, including Comparison in 2014 |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 心理学 军校新生 16PF心理测试 教育管理 |
| 英文关键词: Psychology New cadets 16PF Educational management |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目（81202178） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 734 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：比较某军校2014 级与2010 级本科新生以及14 级新生内部的人格特点，为改善和提高军校的教育管理水平提供有效
依据。方法：对2 个年级新生进行16PF测试，对测查结果进行比较分析。结果：2014级新生在B、C、E、G、H、L、O、Q1、Q3、Q4、适应
与焦虑性、内向与外向、心理健康因素、专业成就个性因素和新环境成长能力因素的得分与2010 级新生得分有显著差异（P<0.
01）。从效果量角度分析，两级新生在A 乐群性，适应与焦虑性，专业成就个性因素以及新环境成长能力因素等方面得分差异的效
果量d 大于0.2。2014 级本科新生在A、B、C、E、I、L、M、O、Q1、Q2、Q3、Q4、感情用事与安详机警型、怯懦与果断型、心理健康因
素、专业成就个性因素、创造能力个性因素以及新环境成长能力因素方面以及适应与焦虑性的得分与士官新生存在显著差异（P
<0.01）。从效果量角度分析，14级本科新生与士官新生在B，E，I，L，M，O，Q2，Q4，适应与焦虑性以及心理健康因素等方面得分差
异的效果量d 大于0.2，在数字搜索成绩，A，Q1，感情用事与安详机警型以及怯懦与果断型等方面得分差异的效果量d 大于0.5。
结论：14 级不同身份学生存在各自特点，军对院校在对其教育管理上要注重方式方法，因材施教，合理引导，培养合格的军校学
员，为我国培养优秀的军官。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective:To compare the differences of personality characteristic of new cadets between 2010 and 2014, including
comparison in 2014, and provide effective basis of improving the level of military and management.Methods:Freshmen in 2014 and
2010 were separately tested with 16PF.Results:Scores of freshmen in 2014 on factor B, C, E, G, H, L, O, Q1, Q3, Q4, adaptation and
anxiety, introversion and extraversion, mental health factor, personality of professional achievements, adapt oneself to circumstances
factor are different to freshmen in 2010 (P <0.01). The effect size of scores on factor A warmth, adaptation and anxiety, personality of
professional achievement and adapt oneself to circumstances factor between the two grades are larger than 0.2(d>0.2). In 2014, Scores of
the freshmen who are undergraduates on factor A, B, C, E, I, L, O, M, Q1 , Q2, Q3, Q4, impetuous action and undisturbed intellect,
coward and resolute type, mental health factor, personality of professional achievements, personality of high creativity, adapt oneself to
circumstances factor, adaptation and anxiety are different to freshmen who are sergeancys(P <0.01). The effect size of scores on factor B,
E, I, L, M, O, Q2, Q4, adaptation and anxiety, mental health factor, personality of professional achievement and adapt oneself to
circumstances factor are larger than 0.2 (d>0.2)in 2014. The effect size of scores on factor A warmth, Q1 openness to change, impetuous
action and undisturbed intellect, coward and resolute type and personality of high creativity are larger than 0.5 (d>0.5).Conclusion:New
cadets in 2014 have typical characteristics. The military must change the policies, paying attention on means, improving the level of
education and management, to cultivate outstanding officers for army. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
