| 唐玉洁 赵德纯 胡庆 唐勇 苟燕.血液灌流联合血液透析对维持性血液透析患者IL-6、TNF-alpha、hs-CRP及
Hcy等指标水平的影响[J].,2015,15(26):5135-5138 |
| 血液灌流联合血液透析对维持性血液透析患者IL-6、TNF-alpha、hs-CRP及
Hcy等指标水平的影响 |
| Influence of Hemoperfusion Combined with Hemodialysis on IL-6, TNF-alpha,hs-CRP and Hcy of Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 血液灌流 血液透析 维持性血液透析 IL-6 TNF-alpha hs-CRP Hcy 影响 |
| 英文关键词: Hemoperfusion Hemodialysis Maintenance hemodialysis IL-6 TNF-alpha hs-CRP Hcy Influence |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 686 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：研究血液灌流联合血液透析对接受维持性血液透析（MHD）的患者白介素-6（IL-6）、肿瘤坏死因子（TNF-alpha）、超敏C
反应蛋白（hs-CRP）及同型半胱氨酸（Hcy）等指标水平的影响。方法：选择2010年5 月至2013 年5 月在我院接受MHD的终末期
肾病112 例作为研究对象。根据数字法随机分成观察组及对照组，每组均含56 例患者。对照组行常规血液透析治疗，观察组行血
液灌流及血液透析的联合治疗。治疗12 周后对比分析两组治疗前后的各项炎性因子与营养学指标，及生活质量指数（QOL）评
分。结果：治疗后观察组的hs-CRP、IL-6 及TNF-alpha与Hcy水平均显著低于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（均P＜0.05）。治疗后观察
组的血清Hb、TP及Alb 与TRF水平均显著高于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（均P＜0.05）。两组治疗后的QOL评分较治疗前均
显著上升，但观察组的上升幅度显著大于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（均P＜0.05）。结论：血液灌流与血液透析联合治疗接受
MHD的患者，可有效改善患者机体的微炎症及营养状况，提升患者的生活质量，效果明显，值得临床推荐。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective:To study the influence of hemoperfusion combined with hemodialysis on the levels of IL-6,TNF-琢, hs-CRP
and Hcy of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.Methods:Atotal of 112 patients with end-stage renal disease, who were treated
with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) in Suining Central Hospital fromMay 2010 to May 2013, were chosen as the study subjects and
randomly divided into observation group (n=56) and control group (n=56). The control group was treated with hemodialysis, and the observation
group was treated with hemoperfusion combined with hemodialysis. After 12 weeks, the indexes of inflammatory factors, nutrition
and the quality of life (QOL) scores of the two groups before and after treatment were compared and analyzed.Results:The levels
of hs-CRP, IL-6, TNF-alpha and Hcy of observation group were significantly lower than those of control group after treatment, the differences
were statistically significant (P<0.05). The levels of Hb, TP and Alb and TRF of observation group were significantly higher than
those of control group after treatment, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Compared with before treatment, the QOL
scores of two groups after treatment significantly increased, but the QOL scores of observation group was significantly higher than those
of control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion:Hemoperfusion combined with hemodialysis can effectively
improve the micro inflammation and nutrition of the patients undergoing MHD, which enhances the QOL of patients and is worthy
of the clinical application. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
