刘胜华 姚庆宁 唐协林 黎乾科 赵超 钟俊 肖奎 周政.骨窗开颅与骨瓣开颅术治疗高血压脑出血的疗效对比分析[J].,2015,15(21):4102-4104 |
骨窗开颅与骨瓣开颅术治疗高血压脑出血的疗效对比分析 |
Clinical Effect Comparison of Bone Window Craniotomy and Bone FlapCraniotomy in Treatment of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 高血压 脑出血 骨窗开颅 骨瓣开颅 |
英文关键词: Hypertension Intracerebral hemorrhage Bone window craniotomy Bone flap craniotomy |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 634 |
全文下载次数: 0 |
中文摘要: |
目的:研究骨窗开颅与骨瓣开颅术治疗高血压脑出血的临床疗效。方法:选取2010 年1 月到2014 年1 月我院收治的高血
压脑出血患者50 例,按照随机数字表法将患者分为A组和B组,每组25 例,A组给予骨窗开颅手术治疗,B 组给予骨瓣开颅手
术治疗,比较两组治疗的总有效率、死亡率以及并发症发生率。结果:A 组总有效率为92.0%,显著高于对照组的64.0%,比较差
异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组病死率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A 组并发症的发生率显著低于B 组,比较差异具有
统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:骨窗开颅手术治疗高血压脑出血具有较高的临床疗效,且其并发症显著低于骨瓣开颅术。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective:To study the clinical effect of bone window craniotomy and bone flap craniotomy in treatment of hypertensive
intracerebral hemorrhage.Methods:Selected 50 cases of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage who were treated in
our hospital from January 2010 to January 2014, they were divided into group A and group B according to the random number table
method, with 25 patients in each group. Group A was underwent bone window craniotomy, while the group B was underwent bone flap
craniotomy, then compared the total effective rate, mortality and incidence of complications in two groups after the craniotomy.Results:Total effective rate of group A was 92.0%, which was significantly higher than 64.0%in group B, the difference was statistically significant(
P<0.05); Mortality in two groups had no significant difference(P>0.05); The incidence of complications of group A was significantly
lower than group B, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion:Bone window craniotomy has a better clinical effect
intreatmentof hypertensive intracerebralhemorrhage, anditsincidence of complicationswas significantlylower thanbone flapcraniotomy. |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |