王星 吴付兵 黄雯 王康霞 王明元.腹腔镜结肠癌根治术与传统开腹结肠癌根治术的临床对比分析[J].,2014,14(30):5920-5922 |
腹腔镜结肠癌根治术与传统开腹结肠癌根治术的临床对比分析 |
Clinical Contrastive Analysis of Laparoscopic Radical Operationand Open Surgery in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 结肠癌根治术 腹腔镜 开腹 |
英文关键词: Colorectal cancer Laparoscope Open surgery |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 827 |
全文下载次数: 1122 |
中文摘要: |
目的:探讨腹腔镜结肠癌根治术与传统开腹结肠癌根治术疗效的差别。方法:随机将86 例结肠癌患者分为两组,各43 例。
腹腔镜组采用腹腔镜结肠癌根治术,传统开腹组采用开腹结肠癌根治术,观察两组患者手术情况及术后并发症情况。结果:腹腔
镜组手术时间、淋巴结清扫数与传统开腹组比较无显著差异(P>0.05);腹腔镜组术中出血量少于传统开腹组、住院时间短于传统
开腹组(P<0.05);腹腔镜组排气时间短于传统开腹组(P<0.01),两组并发症发生率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:腹腔镜结肠
癌根治术具有术中出血量少、创伤小、术后恢复快、住院时间明显缩短等特点,可达到传统开腹手术的效果,值得广泛应用。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective:To compare the effect of laparoscopic radical operation and that of traditional operation on colorectal
cancer.Methods:86 cases of patients with colon cancer were randomly divided into laparoscopic group (43 patients), which were treated
with laparoscopic radical operation and open surgery group (43 patients) which were treated with open surgery, operation situation and
postoperative complications in both groups were observated.Results:The operation time and number of lymph nodes dissected of the
patients in both groups had no statistical differences (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss, average stay length and postoperative
exhaust time in the laparoscopic radical operation group were significantly lower and shorter than those of the patients in the open
surgery group (P<0.05). There was a statistical difference in the complications incidence of the patients in both groups (P<0.01).Conclusion:Laparoscopic radical operation has the characteristics of less blood loss, small trauma, quick recovery, short hospitalization
time and has the same operative effects as the traditional open operation. It is worth wide application. |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |