| 董义臣1 李佳茹1 刘长波1 姜小美1 郭姝2.参苓白术散与诺氟沙星治疗慢性肠炎的临床疗效比较研究*[J].,2014,14(20):3925-3927 |
| 参苓白术散与诺氟沙星治疗慢性肠炎的临床疗效比较研究* |
| Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Shenlingbaizhu Powder andNorfloxacin in the Treatment of Chronic Enteritis* |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 参苓白术散 诺氟沙星 慢性肠炎 中西药临床疗效比较 |
| 英文关键词: Shenlingbaizhu powder Norfloxacin Chronicenteritis Comparision of clinical efficacy between Chinese medicine and
western medicine |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目（81100599） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 693 |
| 全文下载次数: 1249 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 摘要目的：比较中药参苓白术散与西药诺氟沙星治疗慢性肠炎的临床疗效。方法：收集100 例确诊为慢性肠炎的患者，将其随机
分为诺氟沙星治疗组（对照组）与参苓白术散治疗组（治疗组）。对照组口服诺氟沙星，治疗组口服参苓白术散加减，治疗两个疗程
（10 天为一疗程），采用统计学方法观察两组疗效与半年复发率。结果：对照组总有效率为84%，治疗组总有效率为92%，差异显著
(P<0.05)；对照组半年复发率为50%，治疗组半年复发率为10%，差异极显著(P<0.01)。结论：采用参苓白术散治疗慢性肠炎的临床
疗效要优于诺氟沙星，且不易复发，建议在临床上优先选择参苓白术散治疗慢性肠炎。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| ABSTRACT Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of shenlingbaizhu powder(Chinese medicine）with norfloxacinin the treatment
of chronic enteritis.Methods: 100 patients who were diagnosed as chronic enteritis were divided into two groups randomly. One
group, as control group, took norfloxacin orally. Another group, as treatment group, took shenlingbaizhu powder orally. They were both
treated for two courses (10 days for a course of treatment). Statistical methods were used to compare their curative effects and recurrence
rate in half a year. Results：The total effective rate of the control group was 84%, the total effective rate of the treatment group was 92%,
and the difference between themwas significant (P<0.05); The recurrence rate in half a year of the control group was 50%, the recurrence
rate in half a year of the treatment group was 10%, and the difference between them was highly significant (P<0.01). Conclusion：The
clinical efficacy of shenlingbaizhu powder in the treatment was better than norfloxacin, and it is not easy to relapse. So we insist that
shenlingbaizhu powder was the optimization selection for the treatment of chronic enteritis. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
