杨帆 蒋鹏飞 王琼华 许斌兵 杨春亮.不同麻醉方式对剖宫产术后腰背痛发生率的影响[J].,2014,14(14):2730-2732 |
不同麻醉方式对剖宫产术后腰背痛发生率的影响 |
A Comparison of Incidence of the Low Back pain in the Cesarean SectionPatients Undergoing Spinal-epidural Anesthesia、Spinal Anesthesiaand General Anesthesia |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 腰硬联合麻醉 蛛网膜下腔麻醉 全身麻醉 腰背痛 |
英文关键词: Spinal anesthesia Spinal-epidural anesthesia General anesthesia LBP |
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(81102110) |
|
摘要点击次数: 792 |
全文下载次数: 1272 |
中文摘要: |
目的:比较使用不同麻醉方式进行剖宫产术后腰背痛的发生率。方法:拟行剖宫产手术待产孕妇150 例,年龄22-35 岁,美国
麻醉医师协会分级(American Society of Anesthesiologists, ASA)Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,随机分为3 组(n=50),包括腰硬联合麻醉组(CSE 组);
25G 腰穿针蛛网膜下腔麻醉组(S 组);全身麻醉组(G 组),观察并比较术后2 天、7 天、30 天腰背痛发生情况。结果:三组产妇一般
情况,手术时间无显著差异。术后2 天、7 天,S 组与G 组腰背痛发生率无显著差异,但这两组腰背痛发生率低于CSE 组,且差异
有统计学意义;术后30 天三组腰背痛发生率差异无统计学意义。结论:25G腰穿针蛛网膜下腔麻醉和全身麻醉可降低剖宫产术
后近期腰背痛的发生。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective:To compare the incidence of low back pain (LBP) in different methods of anesthesia for cesarean section.Methods:150 ASA I or Ⅱ patients aged 22-35 weighing 63-85 kg were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=50 each) including
Spinal-epidural group (group CSE), Spinal group(group S), General group(group G)received spinal-epidural anesthesia, spinal anesthesia
using 25G needle and general anesthesia respectively. Patients were asked about the incidence of LBP during 2,7and 30 days post of
surgery.Results:Three groups of patients characteristics and duration of surgery had no significant difference. The incidence of LBP in
group S and G was significantly lower than that in group CSE, but the differences between group S and G was no statistically significant
after 2,7days. There were no significant differences, in the incidence of LBP after 30 days in groups.Conclusion:Spinal anesthesia using
25G needle and general anesthesia can decrease the incidence of LBP after cesarean section in comparison with spinal-epidural
anesthesia in short term. |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |