| 石小凤 聂子良 韩咏梅 周丹 郭晓东.EMA/CO化疗方案治疗恶性滋养细胞肿瘤的临床疗效观察[J].,2014,14(11):2088-2091 |
| EMA/CO化疗方案治疗恶性滋养细胞肿瘤的临床疗效观察 |
| Clinical Observation on the Efficacy of EMA/CO Regimen on the Treatmentof Malignant Trophoblastic Tumor |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 恶性滋养细胞肿瘤 EMA/CO化疗方案 临床疗效 毒副反应 |
| 英文关键词: Malignant trophoblastic tumor EMA/CO chemotherapy Clinical efficacy Adverse reaction |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(81301239) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 773 |
| 全文下载次数: 1545 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：恶性滋养细胞肿瘤(Malignant trophoblastic tumor)是胚胎滋养细胞发生病变而产生的恶性肿瘤，严重威胁女性患者的
身体健康及生活质量。本研究对EMA/CO(etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide and vincristine)化疗方案治疗
恶性滋养细胞肿瘤的临床效果及毒副反应情况进行探讨，旨在为该病的临床治疗积累经验。方法：选取我院2010 年8 月-2012 年
12 月收治的恶性滋养细胞肿瘤患者58 例，随机分为研究组和对照组，每组各29 例。对照组采用5-Fu+KSM方案进行治疗，研究
组采用EMA/CO方案治疗。观察并比较两组患者的治疗总有效率及毒副反应的发生情况。结果：对照组治疗总有效率为75.9%，
研究组治疗总有效率为79.3%，两组患者的临床疗效无显著差异(P<0.05)。研究组白细胞减少、呕吐及口腔溃疡程度均比对照组
轻，差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：应用EMA/CO化疗方案治疗恶性滋养细胞肿瘤具有积极的作用，不但可以获得较好的近
期疗效，且毒副反应较轻，值得临床应用推广。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective: Malignant trophoblastic tumor is a kind of cancer that brought by the pathological changes of embryonic
nourish cells which would seriously influence the health and life of female patients. This article is written to discuss the clinical effects
and adverse reactions that induced by the chemotherapy of EMA/CO on the treatment of malignant trophoblastic tumor so as to
accumulate the experience for clinical treatment.Methods: 58 cases with malignant trophoblastic tumor who were treated in our hospital
fromAugust 2010 to December 2012 were selected and randomly divided into the study group and the control group with 29 in each one.
The patients in the control group were treated by 5-Fu+KSM, while the patients in the study group were given the EMA/CO. Then the
rate of total efficacy and the incidence of adverse reactions of patients were observed and compared between the two groups.Results: The
rate of total efficacy in the control group was 75.9%which was similar to the 79.3%in the study group with no significant difference(P<0.
05). There were statistically significant differences about the leukopenia reduction, the vomiting and the oral cavity ulcer of patients
between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion:It is indicated that the application of EMA/CO on the treatment of malignant trophoblastic
tumor should be well promoted to the clinical field with the advantages of better efficacy and lighter adverse reaction. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
