田丰卢强李小飞周勇安韩勇王小平△.CBL+PBL与PBL教学法在胸腔外科临床教学中
的对比分析[J].,2014,14(10):1977-1979 |
CBL+PBL与PBL教学法在胸腔外科临床教学中
的对比分析 |
Application of CBL+PBL Method in Clinical Education of ThoracicSurgery and Compared it with PBL Method |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 病例引导教学法 问题为中心教学法 临床教学 胸外科教学 |
英文关键词: Case-based learning Problembased learning Clinical education Teaching of thoracic surgery |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 731 |
全文下载次数: 860 |
中文摘要: |
摘要目的:对比PBL教学法,研究CBL+PBL法在五年制临床医学本科胸腔外科临床教学中的应用及效果。方法:抽取五年制本
科临床实习生共59 人,随机分为实验组(29 人)与对照组(30 人),实验组采用CBL+PBL 教学法讲授临床实践课,对照组采用单
纯PBL法。授课结束后进行随堂测试及问卷调查。结果:①随堂测试:实验组病例分析题及总成绩高于对照组且差异有统计学意
义(P<0.05),选择题与简答题两组间成绩比较无统计学差异。②问卷调查:在是否有利于培养临床思维能力以及是否有利于理论
联系临床问题中,实验组肯定回答的人数比例均高于对照组且差别有统计学意义。(P<0.05)。两组之间在是否有利于提高学习兴
趣、是否有利于提高团队协作能力、是否有利于知识的理解以及是否赞同本教学方法问题中,差异无统计学意义。结论:
CBL+PBL教学法相对于单纯的PBL教学法而言,更适合在临床教学中应用。 |
英文摘要: |
ABSTRACT Objective:To investigate the effects of CBL+PBL Method in Clinical Education of Thoracic Surgery and Compared it
with PBL Method.Methods:Fifty-nine internships were divided in two groups randomly. The experimental group was applied with
CBL+PBL method in their practice lesson, and the control group was applied with PBL method. When the class was over, a classroom
test and a questionnaire survey were made. Results:① Classroomtest: There was statistical difference between the two groups in score of
case analysis and total points (P<0.05), but no statistical difference in choice-questions and short-answer questions. ② Questionnaire
survey: There was statistical difference between the two groups in promotion of ability of clinical thinking and ability of apply theory to
clinic (P<0.05), but no statistical difference in promotion of cInterest in learning, ability of the team, Comprehension of knowledge and
approve of this teaching method. Conclusion:CBL+PBL method was more suitable for clinical education than PBL method. |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |