| 漆梅聂彬张爱玲纪涛步江.热牙胶充填与冷牙胶侧方加压在根管充填中应用的临床效果比较[J].,2012,12(7):1289-1291 |
| 热牙胶充填与冷牙胶侧方加压在根管充填中应用的临床效果比较 |
| The Clinical Effect Comparison of Hot Gutta-Percha Filling and ColdGutta-Percha Lateral Condensation in the Teeth Root Canal Filling |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 热牙胶充填 冷牙胶侧方加压 根管充填 临床效果 |
| 英文关键词: Hot gutta-percha filling Cold gutta-percha lateral condensation Teeth root canal filling Clinical effect |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 967 |
| 全文下载次数: 2590 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：比较热牙胶充填与冷牙胶侧方加压在根管充填中应用的临床效果。方法：选择62 例急性牙髓炎和根尖周炎患者，均
分后分别选择热牙胶充填与冷牙胶侧方加压的方法进行根管充填，比较两组患者根管充填时间、术后牙周疼痛病例和术后3 个
月后充填质量及临床疗效。结果：两组患者术后牙周疼痛病例比较，差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)；其余各方面比较，差异均均有
统计学意义(P＞0.05)，热牙胶组优于冷牙胶组。结论：临床进行根管充填治疗时，应首选热牙胶充填的方式，可显著提高临床疗
效，且不增加患者术后牙周疼痛的发生。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective: To observe the clinical effect of hot gutta-percha filling and cold gutta-percha lateral condensation in the
teeth root canal filling. Methods: Collect 62 patients with the acute pulpitis and apical periodontitis, they were divided into the hot
gutta-percha group and the cold gutta-percha group, then compare the teeth root canal filling time,the postoperative patients with the
periodontal pain,the filling quality and the clinical effect after 3 months. Results: There was no statistical significant (P＞0.05) in the
postoperative patients with the periodontal pain,there was a statistical significant (P＜0.05) in the remaining aspects,the hot gutta-percha
group's clinical effect were better than the cold gutta-percha group's. Conclusion: We should use hot gutta-percha filling in the teeth root
canal filling first,it could significantly improve the clinical effect and did not increas the incidence of postoperative periodontal pain. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
