戴琪萍裘敏蕾袁晓静陈永强邵萍.不同频率电针治疗膝骨性关节炎的临床疗效观察[J].,2011,11(19):3655-3657 |
不同频率电针治疗膝骨性关节炎的临床疗效观察 |
Clinical Observation of Different Electro-Acupuncture Frequency forKnee Osteoarthritis |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 电针 频率 膝骨关节炎 临床观察 |
英文关键词: Electro-acupuncture Frequency Knee Osteoarthritis Clinical observation |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 645 |
全文下载次数: 1241 |
中文摘要: |
目的:通过临床研究探讨电针治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的最佳参数,为临床提供更加规范性的治疗,进一步提高电针疗效。方
法:将符合膝关节骨性关节炎诊断标准的73 例单膝患者随机分为电针疏波组、密波组两组,均针刺患侧膝眼穴,疏波组接2Hz 连
续波治疗,密波组接40Hz 连续波治疗,采用WOMAC 评分对两组治疗后疼痛、僵硬、躯体功能进行评估,同时判断1 个疗程及3
个疗程治疗效果。结果:经统计学处理,完成第一疗程后,两组疼痛评分比较,P 均<0.01,说明两组在疼痛疗效上存在差异。而两
组僵硬和躯体功能评分的比较,P>0.05,显示两组没有统计学意义。第3 疗程后,两组WOMAC 总分比较,P 均<0.01,具有极显著
性差异,第3 疗程症状积分低于第1 疗程,说明第3 疗程后症状改善优于第1 疗程。结论:电针疏波组在改善疼痛上优于密波组;
第3 疗程后,总体症状改善情况优于第1 疗程。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective: To study the best optimal parameters of electro-acupuncture in treating knee osteoarthritis,and to provide
more normative treatment for clinicians. Methods: Randomly divide 73 patients consistent with the standard efficacy into EA sparse wave
group of 36 cases, dense wave acupuncture group of 37 cas- es. Sparse wave group receives acupuncture and 2Hz wave therapy, dense
wave group receives 40Hz wave treatment, both groups are acupointed Xiyan point, and receives 1 treatment every other day, 45min/everytime,
and 10 times as a course of treatment, continuing for 3 courses. After treatment, respectively determine 1 course treatment and 3
courses treatment. Take detailed records according to the clin- ical symptom, focus on observing the efficacy of each single symptom between
each group, as well as the effect of treatment course to this research. Results: After 1st and 3rd course of treatment, compare with
each other, total score are P <0.01, refers to highly significant differences, and score of 3rd course is under 1st, explain the 3rd course has
a better efficacy than 1st. Conclusion: Both EA sparse wave group and dense wave group have a good effect in improving symptoms of
knee osteoarthritis, and EA sparse wave group has better effi- cacy in improving pain symptom. The 3rd course has a better efficacy than
1st. |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |
|
|
|