| 叶沛光 黄余龙.两种抗真菌药治疗甲癣成本效果分析[J].,2006,6(8):49-50 |
| 两种抗真菌药治疗甲癣成本效果分析 |
| Cost- Effective Analysis of Two Antifungal Agents in the Treatment of Tinea Unguium |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 特比萘芬 氟康唑 甲癣 成本) 效果分析 |
| 英文关键词: Terbinafine Fluconazole Tinea unguium Cost- effectiveness analysis |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1039 |
| 全文下载次数: 1567 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的: 对特比萘芬、氟康唑2 种不同抗真菌药物治疗60 例甲癣病患者的成本效果分析。方法: 选择60 例病例, 随机分
为2 组, 分别给予特比萘芬、氟康唑治疗, 观察各组疗效并运用成本效果法进行分析。结果: 2 种药物均有较好的抗真菌疗效, 特
比萘芬疗效优于氟康唑, 但氟康唑最具有成本效果。结论: 药物经济学分析结果为氟康唑治疗甲癣病较优。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective: Cost- effectiveness analysis of terbinafine and fluconazole in the treatment of 60 cases of tinea unguium was conducted.
Methods: 60 patients with tinea unguium were randomly divided into two therapeutic groups, treated with terbinafine and fluconazole, respectively.
The efficacies in each group were observed and cost- effectiveness analysis was conducted. Results: The two antifungal agents showed
good therapeutic efficacies, in which, the therapeutic efficacy of terbinafine was better than that of fluconazole while the cost- effectiveness of fluconazole
was better than that of terbinafine. Conclusion: The cost- effectiveness analysis showed that fluconazole was better in the treatment of
tinea unguium. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
