步桂英1 杨铭越2 曹雪莲1.新式剖宫产术60 例临床分析[J].,2006,6(3):31-32 |
新式剖宫产术60 例临床分析 |
Clinical Application of Improved Cesarean Section :Analysis of 60 Cases |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 剖宫产术 临床应用 |
英文关键词: Cesarean section Clinical application |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 908 |
全文下载次数: 932 |
中文摘要: |
目的:通过临床观察比较, 探讨新式剖宫产在临床上的应用。方法:随机选择孕妇120 例, 分为改良组(即新式剖宫
产)(n =60)和对照组(即腹壁纵切口剖宫产)(n=60), 观察两组的手术时间, 术中出血、术后病率、术后镇痛药物的使用, 排气时
间以及住院天数等。结果:两组的术后病率无统计学差异(P>0.05), 而改良组的手术时间, 术中出血量, 术后镇痛药物的使用,
排气时间以及住院天数较对照组短(P<0.05), 有显著性差异。结论:新式剖宫产操作简单, 手术时间短, 术中出血少, 术后疼痛
轻, 恢复快, 住院时间短, 取得较好的手术效果。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective :To investigate the clinical application of improved cesarean section(ICS) through clinical observation and
comparison .Methods:120 unigravidas were randomly selected and divided into the improved group(i .e .ICS)(n=60)and control group(i.e .
cesarean delivery of abdominal wall longitudinal incision, CDAWLI)(n=60).In the two groups , the clinical data of operative time , bleeding in
operation, postoperative administration of pain-killer, exsufflation time , length of stay were observed.Results There was no statistical difference
in postoperative disease rates of the two groups(P>0.05);but significant difference in the clinical data of the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion:
Compared with CDAWLI , ICS is easy to operate , which can acquire better effects of shorter operative time , less bleeding in operation ,
slightly postoperative pain , fast recovery and shorter length of stay . |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |
|
|
|