文章摘要
王喜尧,黄丽娟,杜桂芹,徐洪伟,赵博欣.尿液U-ABRBC、U-RBC及U-RBCPA联合检测在肾性血尿中诊断价值分析[J].,2023,(15):2915-2919
尿液U-ABRBC、U-RBC及U-RBCPA联合检测在肾性血尿中诊断价值分析
Diagnostic Value of U-ABRBC, U-RBC and U-RBCPA Combined Urine Tests in Renal Hematuria
投稿时间:2023-02-13  修订日期:2023-03-10
DOI:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2023.15.022
中文关键词: U-ABRBC  U-RBC  U-RBCPA  肾性血尿  诊断价值
英文关键词: U-ABRBC  U-RBC  U-RBCPA  Renal hematuria  Diagnostic value
基金项目:黑龙江省卫生健康委项目(2019-235)
作者单位E-mail
王喜尧 哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院检验科 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150086 wangxiyao19710228@163.com 
黄丽娟 哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院检验科 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150086  
杜桂芹 哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院检验科 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150086  
徐洪伟 哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院检验科 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150086  
赵博欣 哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院检验科 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150086  
摘要点击次数: 447
全文下载次数: 243
中文摘要:
      摘要 目的:探讨尿液U-ABRBC、U-RBC及U-RBCPA联合检测在肾性血尿中诊断价值分析。方法:前瞻性纳入2019年1月-2022年12月在我院就诊的90例肾性血尿患者作为研究对象,并以同期体检健康者90例作为对照。采用Spearman相关性分析分析U-RBCPA、U-RBC、U-ABRBC的表达与肾性血尿的关系;采用logistics回归模型分析肾性血尿的独立危险因素;采用受试者工作曲线(ROC)分析U-RBCPA、U-RBC、U-ABRBC对肾性血尿的诊断价值。结果:研究组U-RBCPA、U-RBC显著高于对照组(P<0.05),而U-ABRBC显著低于对照组(P<0.05);U-RBCPA、U-RBC、U-ABRBC与肾性血尿密切相关(P<0.05);多因素分析结果显示,U-RBCPA、U-RBC、U-ABRBC是影响肾性血尿发生的独立危险因素(P<0.05);U-RBCPA诊断肾性血尿的敏感度75.00 %,特异度76.00 %和AUC值为0.721;U-RBC诊断肾性血尿的敏感度78.00 %,特异度80.00 %和AUC值为0.756;U-ABRBC诊断肾性血尿的敏感度73.00 %,特异度72.00 %和AUC值为0.722;三项指标拟合诊断诊断肾性血尿的敏感度90.00 %,特异度88.00 %和AUC值为0.821。结论:U-RBCPA、U-RBC、U-ABRBC的差异化表达可作为诊断评估肾性血尿的可靠实验室指标。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective: To explore the diagnostic value of U-ABRBC, U-RBC and U-RBCPA combined urine detection in renal hematuria. Methods: 90 patients with renal hematuria admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to December 2022 were prospectively included as study objects, and 90 healthy patients in the same period were taken as control. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between the expression of U-RBCPA, U-RBC, U-ABRBC and renal hemuria. The independent risk factors of renal hematuria were analyzed by logistics regression model. The diagnostic value of U-RBCPA, U-RBC and U-ABRBC in renal hematuria was analyzed by receiver operating curve (ROC). Results: U-RBCPA and U-RBC in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), but U-ABRBC was significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). U-RBCPA, U-RBC, U-ABRBC were closely correlated with renal hemuria (P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that U-RBCPA, U-RBC and U-ABRBC were independent risk factors for renal hemuria (P<0.05). U-RBCPA had a sensitivity of 75.00 %, specificity of 76.00 % and AUC value of 0.721 in the diagnosis of renal hematuria. U-RBC had a sensitivity of 78.00 %, specificity of 80.00% and AUC value of 0.756 in the diagnosis of renal hematuria. The sensitivity, specificity and AUC value of U-ABRBC in the diagnosis of renal hematuria were 73.00 %,72.00% and 0.722. The sensitivity, specificity and AUC value were 90.00 %, 88.00 % and 0.821 respectively. Conclusion: The differential expression of U-RBCPA, U-RBC and U-ABRBC can be used as reliable laboratory indicators for diagnosis and evaluation of renal hematuria.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭