文章摘要
高 娟,罗嫚丽,梁美景,唐海霞,刘晶晶,佘 会,徐 庆.重症监护室患者压力性损伤的危险因素及Braden评分和经皮氧分压的预测价值分析[J].,2022,(16):3163-3167
重症监护室患者压力性损伤的危险因素及Braden评分和经皮氧分压的预测价值分析
Risk Factors for Pressure Injury in Intensive Care Unit Patients and the Predictive Value Analysis of Braden Score and Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure
投稿时间:2022-03-06  修订日期:2022-03-28
DOI:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2022.16.033
中文关键词: 重症监护室  压力性损伤  危险因素  Braden评分  经皮氧分压  预测价值
英文关键词: Intensive care unit  Pressure injury  Risk factors  Braden score  Transcutaneous oxygen pressure  Predictive value
基金项目:安徽省重点研究和开发计划项目(1804h08020297)
作者单位E-mail
高 娟 安徽中医药大学附属六安医院重症医学科 安徽 六安 237000 gaojuanlaszyy@163.com 
罗嫚丽 江苏省人民医院麻醉手术科 江苏 南京 210000  
梁美景 安徽中医药大学附属六安医院重症医学科 安徽 六安 237000  
唐海霞 安徽中医药大学附属六安医院重症医学科 安徽 六安 237000  
刘晶晶 安徽中医药大学附属六安医院重症医学科 安徽 六安 237000  
佘 会 安徽中医药大学附属六安医院重症医学科 安徽 六安 237000  
徐 庆 安徽中医药大学附属六安医院重症医学科 安徽 六安 237000  
摘要点击次数: 487
全文下载次数: 272
中文摘要:
      摘要 目的:分析重症监护室(ICU)患者压力性损伤(PI)的危险因素并探讨Braden评分和经皮氧分压(TcPO2)对其的预测价值。方法:选取2019年12月~2021年12月我院ICU 45例发生PI患者为PI组,另选取ICU 45例未发生PI患者为非PI组,收集患者基线资料、Braden评分及TcPO2。比较两组患者基线资料和Braden评分、TcPO2,采用多因素Logistic回归模型分析ICU患者发生PI的危险因素,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析Braden评分与TcPO2对ICU患者PI发生风险的预测价值。结果:PI组年龄大于非PI组,机械通气比例和体温高于非PI组,住院时间长于非PI组,血清白蛋白、Braden评分、TcPO2低于非PI组(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,年龄增长(OR=1.100,95%CI:1.003~1.206)、体温上升(OR=1.217,95%CI:1.014~1.460)、住院时间延长(OR=1.240,95%CI:1.049~1.467)、Braden评分下降(OR=1.950,95%CI:1.312~2.898)、TcPO2下降(OR=1.128,95%CI:1.053~1.209)为ICU患者发生PI的危险因素(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,Braden评分和TcPO2单独与联合预测ICU患者PI发生风险的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.785、0.794、0.898,Braden评分联合TcPO2预测ICU患者PI发生风险的AUC大于二者单独预测。结论:年龄增长、体温上升、住院时间延长、Braden评分下降、TcPO2下降是ICU患者发生PI的危险因素,Braden评分、TcPO2对ICU患者PI发生风险具有一定的预测价值,二者联合效能更佳。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the risk factors for pressure injury (PI) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and to explore the predictive value of Braden score and transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2). Methods: From December 2019 to December 2021, 45 patients with PI in ICU of our hospital were selected as PI group, and 45 patients without PI in ICU were selected as non PI group. Baseline data, Braden score and TcPO2 of patients were collected. The baseline data, Braden score and TcPO2 of the two groups were compared. The risk factors of PI in ICU patients were analyzed by multivariate Logistic regression model, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to analyze the predictive value of Braden score and TcPO2 on the risk of PI in ICU patients. Results: The age of PI group was older than that of non PI group, the proportion of mechanical ventilation and body temperature were higher than those of non PI group, the length of hospital stay was longer than that of non PI group, and the serum albumin, Braden score and TcPO2 were lower than those of non PI group (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that increasing age (OR=1.100, 95% CI: 1.003~1.206), rising body temperature(OR=1.217, 95% CI: 1.014~1.460), prolonged hospital stay (OR=1.240, 95% CI: 1.049~1.467), decreased Braden score (OR=1.950, 95% CI: 1.312~2.898) and decreased TcPO2(OR=1.128, 95% CI: 1.053~1.209) were the risk factors for PI in ICU patients (P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve(AUC) of Braden score and TcPO2 alone and in combination were 0.785, 0.794 and 0.898, respectively, and the AUC of Braden score and TcPO2 alone in predicting the risk of PI in ICU patients was greater than that of the two alone. Conclusion: Increasing age, rising body temperature, prolonging hospital stay, decreasing Braden score and decreasing TcPO2 are the risk factors of PI in ICU patients. Braden score and TcPO2 have certain predictive value for the risk of PI in ICU patients, and the combination efficiency of the two is better.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭