文章摘要
孙运坡,金秉巍,应学翔,金艳凤,沈容荣.Luminal B型乳腺癌不同亚型的临床病理特征及预后生存分析[J].,2022,(12):2366-2371
Luminal B型乳腺癌不同亚型的临床病理特征及预后生存分析
Clinicopathological Features, Prognosis and Survival Analysis of Different Subtypes of Luminal B Type Breast Cancer
投稿时间:2022-01-07  修订日期:2022-01-30
DOI:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2022.12.034
中文关键词: 乳腺癌  Luminal B型  人表皮生长受体2  病理特征  预后  影响因素
英文关键词: Breast cancer  Luminal B type  Human epidermal growth receptor 2  Pathological features  Prognosis  Influencing factors
基金项目:上海交通大学附属第六人民医院院级课题(DY2019013);中国高校医学期刊临床专项基金项目(11321394)
作者单位E-mail
孙运坡 上海交通大学附属第六人民医院普通外科 上海 200233 yunpo2022@126.com 
金秉巍 上海交通大学附属第六人民医院普通外科 上海 200233  
应学翔 上海交通大学附属第六人民医院普通外科 上海 200233  
金艳凤 上海交通大学附属第六人民医院病理科 上海 200233  
沈容荣 上海交通大学附属第六人民医院普通外科 上海 200233  
摘要点击次数: 657
全文下载次数: 463
中文摘要:
      摘要 目的:分析Luminal B型乳腺癌不同亚型患者的临床病理特征以及预后差异。方法:回顾性分析2006年1月至2016年1月期间上海市第六人民医院徐汇院区和临港院区收治的359例原发性Luminal B型乳腺癌患者的临床病理以及随访资料,根据Luminal B型乳腺癌分子亚型分为人表皮生长受体2(Her-2)阴性组(266例)和Her-2阳性组(93例)。比较两组患者的临床病理特征差异。绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线,分析两组患者5年无进展生存率和总生存率的差异,采用Cox风险比例回归分析Luminal B型乳腺癌患者预后的影响因素。结果:Her-2阳性组TNM分期Ⅲ~Ⅳ期、肿瘤组织学分级Ⅲ级、PR阴性、Ki-67高表达、淋巴结转移比例高于Her-2阴性组(P<0.05)。Her-2阳性组5年DFS、OS生存率分别为12.90%、40.86%,分别低于Her-2阴性组的24.06%、59.77%(Log-Rankχ2=14.500、12.860,P=0.000、0.000)。TNM分期Ⅲ~Ⅳ期、淋巴结转移、Her-2阳性、PR阴性是Luminal B型乳腺癌患者不良预后的危险因素(P<0.05)。结论:Luminal B 型乳腺癌患者不同分子亚型的TNM分期、肿瘤组织学分级、淋巴结转移、Ki-67和PR表达存在差异,同时,TNM分期、淋巴结转移、Her-2阳性、PR阴性是Luminal B 型乳腺癌患者预后不良的危险因素。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the clinicopathological features and prognosis difference of Luminal B type breast cancer patients with different subtypes. Methods: The clinicopathological and follow-up data of 359 cases of primary Luminal B type breast cancer patients who were admitted to Xuhui And Lingang Hospitals of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital from January 2006 to January 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. According to Luminal B type breast cancer molecular subtypes, the patients were divided into the human epidermal growth receptor 2 (Her-2) negative group (266 cases) and the Her-2 positive group (93 cases). The clinicopathological features difference of the two groups were compared. Kaplan-meier survival curve was drawn to analyze the difference of 5-year progression-free survival rate and overall survival rate between the two groups, and Cox proportional regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of the prognosis of Luminal B type breast cancer patients. Results: TNM stage Ⅲ~Ⅳ stage, tumor histological grade Ⅲ grade, PR negative, Ki-67 high expression and lymph node metastasis proportion in Her-2 positive group were higher than those in Her-2 negative group (P<0.05). The 5-year DFS and OS survival rates in Her-2 positive group were 12.90% and 40.86%, respectively, which were lower than 24.06% and 59.77% in Her-2 negative group (Log-Rank χ2=14.500, 12.860, P=0.000, 0.000). TNM stage Ⅲ~Ⅳ stage, lymph node metastasis, Her-2 positive and PR negativewere the risk factors for poor prognosis in Luminal B type breast cancer patients (P<0.05). Conclusion: There are differences in TNM stage, tumor histological grade, lymph node metastasis, Ki-67 and PR expression in different molecular subtypes of Luminal B type breast cancer patients. Meanwhile, TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, Her-2 positive and PR negative are risk factors for poor prognosis in Luminal B type breast cancer patients.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭