文章摘要
单红平,林婷婷,张晓卫,符苏杰,权 珊.全冠修复联合牙合贴面修复治疗牙体缺损疗效及对抗折强度影响[J].,2021,(14):2713-2716
全冠修复联合牙合贴面修复治疗牙体缺损疗效及对抗折强度影响
Effect of Full Crown Restoration Combined with Occlusal Veneer in the Treatment of Tooth Defect and Its Effect on Fracture Strength
投稿时间:2020-11-28  修订日期:2020-12-23
DOI:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2021.14.024
中文关键词: 全冠修复  牙合贴面修复  牙体缺损  抗折强度
英文关键词: Full crown restoration  Occlusal veneer restoration  Tooth defect  Fracture strength
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目(2018VJX065)
作者单位E-mail
单红平 南京中医药大学第二附属医院(江苏省第二中医院)口腔门诊 江苏 南京 210017 shan18551682979@163.com 
林婷婷 南京中医药大学第二附属医院(江苏省第二中医院)口腔门诊 江苏 南京 210017  
张晓卫 南京中医药大学第二附属医院(江苏省第二中医院)口腔门诊 江苏 南京 210017  
符苏杰 南京中医药大学第二附属医院(江苏省第二中医院)口腔门诊 江苏 南京 210017  
权 珊 南京中医药大学第二附属医院(江苏省第二中医院)口腔门诊 江苏 南京 210017  
摘要点击次数: 50
全文下载次数: 63
中文摘要:
      摘要 目的:探讨全冠修复联合牙合贴面修复治疗牙体缺损疗效及对抗折强度影响。方法:选取我院口腔科2018年6月至2020年6月收治的牙体缺损患者80例,将其随机分为研究组和对照组,每组患者40例,研究组应用全冠修复联合牙合贴面修复治疗,对照组只应用全冠修复治疗,对比两组的治疗效果、美观、固定及咀嚼功能、折裂载荷值以及不良反应情况。结果:研究组的治疗总有效率显著高于对照组(95.05 % vs.80.0 %,P<0.05);研究组的美观、固定及咀嚼功能明显高于对照组(P<0.05);研究组的折裂载荷值明显好于对照组(P<0.05);研究组发生不良反应的概率明显低于对照组(5.0 % vs. 22.5 %,P<0.05)。结论:利用全冠修复联合牙合贴面修复治疗牙体缺损效果优于单纯全冠修复,抗折强度较高,美观、固定及咀嚼功能好,安全性好,值得临床应用推广。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the effect of full crown restoration combined with occlusal veneer in the treatment of tooth defect and the influence of fracture strength. Methods: A total of 80 patients with tooth defect, who were treated in Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine from June 2018 to June 2020, were selected and randomly divided into study group(n=40) and control group(n=40). The study group was treated with full crown restoration combined with occlusal veneer restoration, while the control group was only treated with full crown restoration. The treatment effect, aesthetics, fixation and chewing function, fracture load value and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results: The total effective rate in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (95.05 % vs. 80.0 %, P<0.05). The beauty, fixation and chewing function of the study group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The fracture load value of the study group was much better than that of the control group (P<0.05). The probability of adverse reactions in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (5.0 % vs. 22.5 %, P<0.05). Conclusion: The effect of full crown restoration combined with occlusal veneer restoration in the treatment of tooth defect is better than that of simple full crown restoration, with high fracture strength, good aesthetics, good fixation and chewing function, and good safety, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭