| 卢子瑄,裴崇哲,孟 舒,李岩松,夏静雯.红细胞分布宽度和超敏C反应蛋白对射血分数保留心衰的诊断价值分析[J].,2018,(3):467-471 |
| 红细胞分布宽度和超敏C反应蛋白对射血分数保留心衰的诊断价值分析 |
| The Value of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein in the Diagnosis of HfpEF |
| 投稿时间：2017-08-23 修订日期：2017-09-18 |
| DOI：10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2018.03.014 |
| 中文关键词: 红细胞分布容积 超敏C反应蛋白 射血分数保留心衰 |
| 英文关键词: RDW hsCRP HFpEF |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 548 |
| 全文下载次数: 390 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 摘要 目的：探讨红细胞分布宽度（RDW）和超敏C反应蛋白（hsCRP）对射血分数保留心衰（HFpEF）的诊断价值，为临床诊断提供资料。方法：研究共纳入2013 年12 月至2016年12月上海市第七人民医院收治的368 例CHF 患者，对其临床资料进行回顾性分析，用Logisitic回归分析确定HFpEF的独立危险因素，用ROC曲线分析确定RDW和hsCRP对于HFpEF诊断的最佳Cut-off值及其预测价值。结果：HFpEF患者的RDW（12.83±1.09）和hsCRP（8.70±17.81）水平显著低于非HFpEF组患者的RDW（13.58±1.20）和hsCRP（14.24±30.90）水平；较低的RDW（OR=1.831）和hsCRP（OR=1.003）是HFpEF的独立危险因素；对RDW和hsCRP进行ROC曲线分析，hsCRP的AUC为0.814[95%CI(0.758～0.871）]，最佳鉴别界值为185.6；RDW的AUC为0.694[95%CI(0.624～0.764）]，最佳鉴别界值为13.15。结论：HFpEF患者的RDW和hsCRP水平显著低于非HFpEF型心衰患者，RDW和hsCRP对于HFpEF均有较高的诊断价值，可作为临床诊断HFpEF的参考指标。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the value of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) in the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods: Three hundred and six- ty-eight chronic heart failure patients in Shanghai 7th people's hospital between December 2013 to December 2016, were enrolled. All clinical data of the patients were analyzed retrospectively. The independent risk factor of HFpEF were analyzed with Logistics regression analysis. And the efficiency and accuracy of RDW and hsCRP on diagnosis of HFpEF were evaluated with ROC curve. Results: The level of RDW (12.83±1.09) and hsCRP (8.70±17.81) in HFpEF patients were siginificantly lower than non-HFpEF patients (RDW: 13.58±1.20, hsCRP: 14.24±30.90). Logistics regression analysis showed that RDW and hsCRP are independent risk factors of HFpEF patients. The AUC of RDW on diagnosis of HFpEF patients is 0.694 [95%CI(0.624～0.764）], with a best optimum boundary value of 13.15. The AUC of hsCRP on diagnosis of HFpEF patients is 0.814[95%CI(0.758～0.871）], with a best optimum boundary value of 185.6. Conclusion: The level of RDW and hsCRP in HFpEF patients are significantly lower than that of non-HFpEF patients. The value of RDW and hsCRP on the diagnosis of HFpEF are high, which suggesting that RDW and hsCRP could be appropriate indicators on the clinical diagnosis of HFpEF. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
