文章摘要
张 静,宫爱霞,赵亚静,卢 英,李华伟.美沙拉秦对缓解期溃疡性结肠炎患者血清炎症因子的影响[J].,2017,17(28):5520-5523
美沙拉秦对缓解期溃疡性结肠炎患者血清炎症因子的影响
Effect of Mesalazine on the Serum Inflammatory Factors of Patients with Ulcerative Colitis in Remission
投稿时间:2017-01-05  修订日期:2017-01-30
DOI:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2017.28.028
中文关键词: 溃疡性结肠炎  缓解期  美沙拉秦  炎性因子  疗效
英文关键词: Ulcerative colitis  Remission  Mesalazine  Inflammatory factors  Clinical efficacy
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
张 静 盘锦市中心医院腔镜中心 辽宁 盘锦 124010 zhangjing_1978@msdthesisonline.cn 
宫爱霞 大连医科大学附属第一医院消化内镜科 辽宁 大连 116044  
赵亚静 盘锦市中心医院消化内科 辽宁 盘锦 124010  
卢 英 盘锦市中心医院腔镜中心 辽宁 盘锦 124010  
李华伟 盘锦市中心医院消化内科 辽宁 盘锦 124010  
摘要点击次数: 151
全文下载次数: 97
中文摘要:
      摘要 目的:探讨美沙拉秦对缓解期溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者血清炎性因子水平的影响。方法:收集2013年5月至2016年5月于我院治疗的缓解期UC患者153例,随机分为观察组75例及对照组78例。对照组患者给予常规治疗,观察组在对照组的基础上加用美沙拉秦治疗。观察比较两组治疗前后的血清白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、白细胞介素-8(IL-8)、白细胞介素-17(IL-17)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平、疾病活动指数(DAI)评分、临床疗效、病情复发和不良反应的发生情况。结果:治疗后,观察组治疗总有效率为96.0%,明显高于对照组的62.8% (P<0.05);观察组的血清IL-6、IL-8、IL-17及TNF-α水平均较治疗前明显降低,且显著低于对照组(P<0.05);两组的DAI评分均有明显改善,但观察组的改善幅度明显大于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者的复发率(2.6%)显著低于对照组(21.8%)(P<0.05),两组不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:美沙拉秦治疗缓解期溃疡性结肠炎的临床疗效显著,可显著抑制患者的炎症反应,同时可改善患者的临床症状,降低复发率,且安全性高。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the effect of mesalazine on the serum inflammatory factors of patients with ulcerative colitis in remission. Methods: 153 patients with ulcerative colitis in remission admitted into our hospital were divided into the control group and the observation group. 78 cases in the control group were treated with conventional treatment, and 75 cases in the observation group were treated with mesalazine based on the control group. The serum inflammatory factors including IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, TNF-α, DAI score, clinical efficacy, relapse and adverse reaction in both groups were observed and compared. Results: After treatment, the clinical effective rate of observation group was 96.0%, which was much higher than that of the control group(62.8%, P<0.05). The serum levels of IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, TNF-α of both group were markedly lower than those before treatment, which were much lower in the observation group than those of the control group (P<0.05). The DAI score in both groups showed obvious improvement, and the DAI score of observation group was much better than that of the control group (P<0.05). In addition, the incidence of relapse was 2.6% in the observation group, which was significantly lower than that of the control group(21.8%, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion: Mesalazine had a great capability of treating patients with ulcerative colitis in remission by inhibiting the serum levels of inflammatory factors, improving the clinical symptoms and decreasing incidence of relapse with high safety.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭