文章摘要
李文龙,陈长春,高 浩,兰天亮,刘 勇.下颈椎骨折脱位合并急性脊髓损伤的手术方式选择及疗效对比[J].,2017,17(18):3544-3548
下颈椎骨折脱位合并急性脊髓损伤的手术方式选择及疗效对比
Effect of Different Surgical Approaches on Treatment of Lower Cervical Vertebra Fracture and Dislocation Combined with Acute Spinal Cord Injury
投稿时间:2017-01-17  修订日期:2017-02-12
DOI:10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2017.18.034
中文关键词: 下颈椎  骨折脱位  脊髓损伤  疗效
英文关键词: Lower cervical spine  Fracture and dislocation  Spinal cord injury  Effect
基金项目:宝鸡市卫计局科研立项课题(2015-10)
作者单位E-mail
李文龙 宝鸡市中心医院 陕西 宝鸡 721008 82898167@qq.com 
陈长春 宝鸡市中心医院 陕西 宝鸡 721008  
高 浩 宝鸡市中心医院 陕西 宝鸡 721008  
兰天亮 宝鸡市中心医院 陕西 宝鸡 721008  
刘 勇 宝鸡市中心医院 陕西 宝鸡 721008  
摘要点击次数: 260
全文下载次数: 95
中文摘要:
      摘要 目的:分析不同手术方式处理下颈椎骨折脱位合并急性脊髓损伤疗效。方法:选取2012年10月-2015年10月本院收治的110例下颈椎骨折脱位合并急性脊髓损伤患者作为研究对象。A组36例实施前路手术,B组44例实施后路手术,C组30例实施前后路联合手术。比较三种手术方式的治疗效果。结果:术后12个月,三组患者Cobb角、椎体水平位移距离均较术前显著改善(P<0.05),C组患者改善程度显著高于A、B组(P<0.05);C组患者JOA评分优良率显著高于A、B组(P<0.05);在术后随访过程中,三组患者并发症总发生情况无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:前后路联合手术治疗可更好地恢复颈椎解剖结构,促进脊髓神经功能恢复,值得在临床工作中进行推广。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the clinical effect of three different surgical approaches on the treatment of lower cervical vertebra fracture and dislocation combined with acute spinal cord injury. Methods: 110 patients with lower cervical vertebra fracture and dislocation combined with acute spinal cord injury who were treated in our hospital from October 2012 to October 2015 were selected and randomly divided into three groups. 36 patients in group A were treated with anterior surgery, 44 patients in group B were treated with posterior surgery, and 30 cases in group C were treated with anterior combined posterior operation. Then the clinical effects of different methods were observed and compared. Results: After operation, the Cobb angle and the horizontal displacement distance of the three groups significantly improved (P<0.05). The improvement of group C was significantly higher than that of group A and group B (P <0.05). The JOA score of group C was significantly higher than that of group A and group B (P <0.05). The total incidence of complications had no significant difference among the three groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Anterior and posterior combined surgical treatment jas better effect on the restoring the anatomical structure of cervical spine and promoting the recovery of spinal nerve function, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭