| 郭睿 戴建峰 罗玉明 沈虹 徐俐.单气囊小肠镜与胶囊内镜对不明原因消化道出血的诊断价值[J].,2017,17(6):1070-1072 |
| 单气囊小肠镜与胶囊内镜对不明原因消化道出血的诊断价值 |
| Diagnostic Value of Single-balloon Enteroscopy and Capsule Endoscopy inObscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 不明原因消化道出血 单气囊小肠镜 胶囊内镜 |
| 英文关键词: Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding Single-balloon enteroscopy Capsule endoscopy |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1106 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：探讨单气囊小肠镜（SBE）与胶囊内镜（CE）对不明原因消化道出血（OGIB）患者的诊断价值。方法：将在我院治疗的
100例OGIB 患者按照诊断方式的不同分为SBE 组和CE 组各50 例。对两组的病灶检出率，病因诊断率以及安全性进行比较。结
果：SBE 组病因诊断率为78.0 %，CE 组病因诊断率为60.0 %，两组病因诊断率比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。SBE组病灶检
出率为80.0 %（40/50），CE组病灶检出率为86.0 %（43/50），两组病灶检出率比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。SBE 组患者检查
较顺利，CE 组胶囊滞留率为4.0 %。所有患者检查后均未出现不良反应及并发症。结论：息肉及粘膜糜烂溃疡病变的OGIB 患者
在SBE 与CE 检查方法中较为常见，CE 病灶检出率与SBE 相当，两种检查方法均较可靠，CE检查更为方便。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective:To investigate the diagnostic value of the single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) and capsule endoscopy (CE) for
obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB).Methods:According to different diagnostic methods,100 patients with OGIB were divided into
SBE group and CE group, 50 patients each group. The lesion detection rate, diagnosis rate and safety were compared between two
groups.Results:The etiology diagnosis rate of SBE group was 78 %, and the etiological diagnosis rate of group CE was 60 %, and there
was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The detection rate of lesions in group SBE was 80% (40/50), the
detection rate of CE group was 86 %(43/50), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The examination
for the patients in SBE group was more smoothly, while the capsule retention rate in CE group was 4.0%. No patients experienced
adverse reactions and complications after inspection.Conclusion:The polyps, mucosal erosion and ulcer disease in OGIB patients is
very common by SBE and CE inspection methods, and the detection rate of lesion is equivalent and reliable in two methods and CE
examination is more convenient. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
