| 丁凌 胡兵 陈亮 胡莉莉 王博.经腹、经阴道与经会阴三种超声途径测量宫颈长度对早产的预测价值[J].,2016,16(30):5961-5963 |
| 经腹、经阴道与经会阴三种超声途径测量宫颈长度对早产的预测价值 |
| Clinical Value of Transabdominal, Transperineal and TransvaginalUltrasound Methods on Prediction of PretermBirth by Detecting CervicalLength |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 超声检查 宫颈长度 早产 临床价值 |
| 英文关键词: Ultrasonic examination Cervical length Premature birth Clinical value |
| 基金项目:湖北省自然科学基金项目（2012FFB02421） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 614 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：比较经腹、经阴道与经会阴三种超声途径测量宫颈长度对早产的预测价值。方法：选取我院就诊的孕妇780 例，根据测
量途径不同分为三组，每组260 例，分别采用经腹、经阴道与经会阴方法测量宫颈长度。观察并比较三组患者的妊娠结局，以及三
种测量方法的敏感度及特异性。结果：三组患者接受率相比，经腹组、经会阴组患者接受率明显高于经阴道组（P<0.05）；三组患者
宫颈显示率相比，经会阴组、经阴道组宫颈显示率显著高于经腹组（P<0.05）。经腹组中，宫颈长度<2.5 cm 的患者早产率为
48.46%，明显高于宫颈长度≥ 2.5 cm的患者早产率17.69%（P<0.05）；经会阴组中，宫颈长度<2.5 cm 的患者早产率为37.69%，明
显高于宫颈长度≥ 2.5 cm的患者早产率13.08%（P<0.05）；经阴道组中，宫颈长度<2.5 cm的患者早产率为36.92%，明显高于宫颈
长度≥ 2.5 cm的患者早产率13.46%（P<0.05）。结论：三种超声途径测量宫颈长度对预测早产均有很大的临床价值，其中经会阴途
径优势更大，值得进一步推广临床使用。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective:To compare the clinical value of transabdominal, transperineal and transvaginal ultrasound in predicting the
pretermbirth by detecting the cervical length.Methods:780 pregnant women were selected and according to different detecting methods,
the patients were divided into three groups, with 260 cases in each group. The pregnant women were detected the cervical length by
transabdominal, transperineal and transvaginal ultrasound, respectively. Then the pregnancy outcomes and the sensitivity and specificity
of the three kinds of methods were observed and compared.Results:The acceptance rate of transabdominal group and transperineal
group were significantly higher than that of transvaginal group (P<0.05); The display rate of cervix of transperineal group and
transvaginal group were significantly higher than that of transabdominal group (P<0.05). For the transabdominal group, the pretermbirth
rate of pregnant women with cervical length <2.5 cm was 48.46%, which was significantly higher than 17.69% of pregnant women with
cervical length ≥ 2.5 cm (P<0.05); For the transperineal group, the preterm birth rate of pregnant women with cervical length <2.5 cm
was 37.69%, which was significantly higher than 13.08% of pregnant women with cervical length ≥ 2.5 cm (P<0.05); For the
transvaginal group, the preterm birth rate of pregnant women with cervical length <2.5 cm was 36.92%, which was significantly higher
than 13.46% of pregnant women with cervical length ≥ 2.5 cm (P<0.05). The sensitivity of the transabdominal examination was
significantly lower than that of the transperineal group and transvaginal group (P<0.05).Conclusion:The three kinds of ultrasonic
measurements of cervical length have great clinical value in predicting premature, of which transperineal approach has greater
advantages, and it is worthy of further application. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
