| 王久清 黄昌林 杨雪迎 杜云飞 翟艺宗.两种压疮评估量表在骨科患者中的应用研究[J].,2015,15(4):685-688 |
| 两种压疮评估量表在骨科患者中的应用研究 |
| The Application of two Pressure Sores Assessment Scalein the Orthopedic Patients |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 压疮评估量表 骨科 压疮 效果 |
| 英文关键词: Pressure Sores Assessment Scale Orthopedics Pressure sores Effect |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 878 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：比较分析Waterlow和Norton 两种压疮评估量表在预测骨折患者压疮中的临床效果。方法：选取某院骨科患者186
例，由2 名临床护士分别用2 种量表对患者进行皮肤评估和量表评分，两者分别独立进行，比较分析两种量表对患者压疮的预测
效果。结果：患者共发生压疮5 例，发生率为2.69%（5/186）；Waterlow 量表和Norton 量表的临界预测值分别为17 分和14 分；而
二者的受试者工作特征曲线(Receiver Operator Curve，ROC)下面积分别为0.647和0.439。结论：Waterlow 量表包含了与骨科疾病
相关的压疮危险因素，更加适用于预测骨科患者压疮，但仍需要做进一步改进。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective:To compare two types of pressure sores Assessment Scale (Waterlow and Norton Scale) in the prediction of
pressure sores of orthopedic patients.Methods:186 orthopedic patients were selected, the Waterlow and Norton Scale were used to assess
the skin situation by two clinical independent nurses respectively, the predict effects of the two scales were compared.Results:5 cases of
orthopedic patients got pressure sores, and the rate was 2.69% (5/186); The predictive value ofWaterlow and Norton were 17 points and
14 points; while their receiver operating characteristic curve (Receiver Operator Curve, ROC) area were 0.562 and 0.478 respectively.Conclusion:Waterlow scale contained pressure sores risk factors associated with orthopedic disorders, and it was more suitable for orthopedic
patients, but further improvement was still needed. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
