| 江瑾 贾暮云 袁荣涛 王科 张奎 卜令学.不保留导管的腮腺浅叶切除术后单纯负压加压预防涎瘘的研究[J].,2014,14(19):3718-3722 |
| 不保留导管的腮腺浅叶切除术后单纯负压加压预防涎瘘的研究 |
| The Application of Entire Process Suction Drainage to Prevent SalivaryFistula after Superficial Parotidectomy with Stensen Duct Ligation |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 腮腺浅叶切除术 涎瘘 负压引流 |
| 英文关键词: Superficial parotidectomy Salivary fistula Suction drain |
| 基金项目:青岛市科技发展指导计划（KZD-11） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 726 |
| 全文下载次数: 587 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：涎瘘为腮腺病变术后常见的并发症，术后放置负压引流结合绷带加压包扎1 周或2 周时间，已经成为腮腺术后预防
涎瘘的常规方法。本研究着重于评价单纯负压引流在腮腺手术后涎瘘预防的临床价值，并根据术后引流量、引流天数与涎瘘的关
系，寻找最佳的拔管时机。方法：不保留腮腺导管的腮腺浅叶切除的腮腺疾病病人194 例，分为传统加压组（第一组）和单纯负压
组（第二组），第一组病人拔除引流管后继续加压包扎，第二组病人拔管后不再加压包扎；记录术后涎瘘情况，对比两组涎瘘率的
差异，同时分析单纯负压组引流量、引流天数与术后涎瘘的关系。结果：传统加压组涎瘘率（11.6 %）与单纯负压组涎瘘率（15.5 %）
对比无统计学差异（P>0.05）；单纯负压组，引流天数与涎瘘率对比无明显相关（P>0.05），而引流量少于20 mL与（20～30）mL 对比
术后涎瘘率差异显著。结论：单纯负压引流能代替传统拔管后继续加压包扎预防涎瘘，从而避免了因绷带加压包扎引起的诸多并
发症；另外，在评估拔管时机时，引流量比引流时间更重要，且引流量小于20 mL 可作为最佳的拔管时机，这可作为一个指导临床
治疗的共识。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective:Parotid salivary fistula is a common complication after parotidectomy, and suction drainage tube combining
with bandaged one or two weeks in the area of parotid lesions, has become the conventional method of preventing parotid salivary
fistula. This study focuses on evaluating the clinic application of entire process suction drainage to prevent salivary fistula after parotidectomy,
and to select the best time point to remove the drainage according to the drain output and the drain duration.Methods:A cohort of
194 patients with parotid diseases after superficial parotidectomy was assigned into traditional pressure group (Group 1) and entire process
suction group (Group 2). Pressure dressing was involved after suction drain removed in Group 1, while entire process suction was
fixed in Group 2. The relationship of the output, duration and salivary fistula was also analyzed.Results:The traditional occurrence of
salivary fistula of the pressure groups was 11.6 %, and the rate of the entire process suction groups was 15.5 %. No statistical significance
was found between the two groups (P>0.05). In the group 2, significant correlation of the drain duration and salivary fistula was not
found (P>0.05), however the drain output of (0~20) ml and (20~30) ml resulted in the different rates of the salivary fistula related to postparotidectomy.Conclusion:According to our findings, the entire process suction used as drainage can be a substitute for the traditional
pressure method in preventing the salivary fistula related to postparotidectomy, and this avoids many complications due to the pressure
bandage. In addition drainage output at extubation time is more important than drainage duration, and the best time point of drainage
extubation referred to drain output less than 20 ml in 24-hour period, which can be used as a consensus to guide clinical treatment. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
