| 卢强1 李小飞1 黄立军1 王伟峰2 王居正3 韩勇1△.PBL 与LBL 教学法在胸外科临床教学中的对比研究[J].,2012,12(27):5372-5375 |
| PBL 与LBL 教学法在胸外科临床教学中的对比研究 |
| Comparative Study of the PBL and LBL Teaching Methods in the ClinicalTeachingof Thoracic Surgery |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 以问题为中心教学法 以授课为基础教学法 胸外科 教学质量 |
| 英文关键词: Problem-based learning Lecture-based learning Thoracic surgery The quality of teaching |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 643 |
| 全文下载次数: 758 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：对比研究以问题为中心教学法（PBL）与基于课堂的学习（LBL）即传统教学法在胸外科临床教学中教学的效果。方法：
随机抽取临床专业学生100 名，随机分为LBL 教学组及LBL 教学组各50 人。在学习结束时，采用闭卷考试的形式进行成绩考
核；同时采用不记名问卷调查，进行两种教学效果和教学模式的评价。结果：共纳入99 例学生，分析显示PBL 教学法与LBL 教学
法对医学生相关知识的掌握有影响。PBL 教学法的教学模式在理论成绩与实践考核等方面优于传统教学法。结论：采用PBL 教学
法有助于提高学生的自主临床思维、提高学生的学习积极性，最终可以有效提高学习效果。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective: To investigate the teaching effects of problem-based learning (PBL) and traditional teaching methods,
lecture-based learning (LBL) in thoracic surgery clinical teaching. Methods: 100 clinical students were randomly divided into two groupsthe
LBL group and the LBL group. At the end of the study, an exam was tested as the result of the thoracic surgery clinical teaching. The
anonymous questionnaires has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of the two teaching mode. Results: There were 99 students in this
research. There was statistical difference in the two teaching mode. PBL method was superior to LBL method in the theoretical results
and practical assessment. Conclusion: The use of PBL to improve student learning and actively help to improve students' independent
clinical thinking, and ultimately can improve learning outcomes. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
