| 朱海峰1,2 郑向民3 谢静3 蔡相军2△.经胸前壁入路内镜甲状腺手术与传统甲状腺手术的
对照研究[J].,2012,12(17):3302-3304 |
| 经胸前壁入路内镜甲状腺手术与传统甲状腺手术的
对照研究 |
| A Comparision Study of Breast Approach Endoscopic Thyroidectomyand Conventional Thyroidectomy |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 经胸前壁入路内镜甲状腺手术 传统甲状腺手术 出血量 术后疼痛 功能恢复 美容满意度 |
| 英文关键词: Breast approach endoscopy thyroidectomy Conventional thyroidectomy Hemorrhage Postoperative pain Functional
recovery Satisfaction of cosmetology |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 452 |
| 全文下载次数: 730 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的：通过临床非随机性对照研究，比较经胸前壁入路内镜甲状腺手术与传统甲状腺手术在手术时间、术中出血量、术后引
流量、术后疼痛、功能恢复、术后住院时间、住院费用及美容效果上的不同，探讨经胸前壁入路内镜甲状腺手术的可行性及临床效
果。方法：回顾性分析86 例甲状腺手术，其中46 例患者采用经胸前壁入路内镜甲状腺手术的患者为内镜组，40 例行传统甲状腺
手术为传统组。结果：两组患者均顺利完成手术，术后恢复良好，均未发生术后大出血、喉返神经、喉上神经及甲状旁腺损伤等并
发症。两组患者的术后住院时间及术后引流量无显著差异。与传统组比较，内镜组手术时间明显延长（P<0.05），术中出血量明显减
少（P<0.05），术后疼痛明显降低（P<0.05），功能恢复即术后自行下床洗漱时间明显缩短（P<0.05），住院费用显著增加（P<0.05），手
术美容效果满意度明显提高（P<0.05）。结论：相对传统甲状腺手术，经胸前壁入路内镜甲状腺手术具有切口小、出血量少、术后疼
痛轻、功能恢复快、美容满意度高等优点，是治疗甲状腺疾病安全、有效的手术方法。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective: To evaluate the clinical benefits of breast approach endoscopic thyroidectomy by comparing the operative
time，operative hemorrhage, postoperative drainage, postoperative pain, functional recovery，hospitalization time, cost of hospitalization
and cosmetic satisfaction in a clinical n onrandomness study. Method: To review eighty-six patients who underwe nt thyroidectomy,
fortysix patients who underwent endoscopic thyroidectomy were enrolled endoscopic group and forty patients who underwent
conventional thyroidectomy were enrolled conventional group. Results: All patients in both group were successfully completed surgery,
postoperative recovery was good. No complication such as postoperative bleeding, recurrent laryngeal nerve or superior laryngeal nerve
or parathyroid injury. Bleeding volume and postoperative drainage of two groups had no significantl difference. The operation time in
endoscopic group was significantly longer than that in conventional group (P<0.05). The bleeding volume in endoscopic group was
significantly less than that in conventional group (P<0.05). The time spans of recovery to independently walking and washing in
endoscopic group were significantly shorter than that in conventional group(P<0.05). The cost of hospitalization in endoscopic group was
significantly higher than that in conventional group (P<0.05). The postoperative cosmetic satisfaction in endoscopic group was
significantly higher than that in conventional group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with conventional thyoidectomy, breast approach
endoscopy offers quicker functional recovery and higher cosmetic satisfaction with less postoperative pain. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
