文章摘要
林烂芳1 胡斌1△ 李淑元1 吕明2,3 杨亚军1,4 袁子宇4 王笑峰1,4.不同劳动者类型脂代谢相关表型的差异分析[J].,2012,12(16):3098-3101
不同劳动者类型脂代谢相关表型的差异分析
Comparison of Lipid Metabolism Related Phenotypes betweenTwo Job Types
  
DOI:
中文关键词: 体力劳动者  脑力劳动者  脂代谢相关表型
英文关键词: Manual worker  Brain worker  Lipid metabolism related phenotypes
基金项目:国家科技支撑项目(2008BAI52B03);国家自然科学基金(30890034)
作者单位
林烂芳1 胡斌1△ 李淑元1 吕明2,3 杨亚军1,4 袁子宇4 王笑峰1,4 复旦大学生命科学学院现代人类学教育部重点实验室 
摘要点击次数: 712
全文下载次数: 1020
中文摘要:
      目的:比较体力劳动者与脑力劳动者在脂代谢相关表型方面是否有差异。方法:随机抽取泰州市30-75 岁个体127 例(体力 劳动者63 例,脑力劳动者64 例),进行体力活动日记、身高、体重、腰围、臀围、收缩压、舒张压体格指标测量。取静脉血测量血清空 腹血糖(Glu)、总胆固醇(TC)和甘油三酯(TG);使用酶联免疫吸附法测量血清中脂代谢生物标志物低密度脂蛋白受体(LDLR)、 载脂蛋白A5(Apo A5)、载脂蛋白B100(Apo B100)、微粒体甘油三酯转运蛋白(MTTP)。采用T 检验和卡方检验统计方法比较体 力劳动者与脑力劳动者脂代谢相关表型是否有统计学差异。结果:脑力劳动者组的体力活动能量消耗显著低于体力劳动者组 (P<0.05),且随着能量消耗等级递增而比例递减(P<0.05)。脑力劳动者组BMI 水平显著高于体力劳动者组(P<0.05)。另外,脑力劳动 者组在LDLR、Apo A5、Apo B100 分子水平都显著低于体力劳动者组(P<0.05)。结论:不同劳动类型影响脂代谢相关表型水平的高 低。
英文摘要:
      Objective: To explore the relationship between job types (brain workers versus manual workers) and metabolic related phenotypes. Methods: 127 participants (30-75 years) were randomly selected from Taizhou city. The participants received a physical examination by trained investigators, including measurement of height, weight, waist and hip circumferences and blood pressure. In addition, we measured the level of 4 lipid metabolism related markers (LDLR, MTTP, Apo A5, Apo B100) using Elisa. The relationship between job types (brain workers versus manual workers) and metabolic related phenotypes were tested by T test and x2 test. Results: There was statistical difference on energy expenditure and BMI between two groups (P<0.05), and energy expenditure in brain workers diminished with increasing energy consumption level. The level of three biological markers (LDLR, Apo A5, Apo B100) between two groups had statistical significance(P<0.05). Conclusions: Job types influence the levels of metabolism related phenotypes.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭